Villain For Spider-Man 3?

he means the talking about chameleon,now, how church said, he is a duno what- of multiple colors (what has multiple colors,chamelons, cos he can change colors, and the dunno what, maybe how he change, the eltronic moduler of his face) plus, cg artists were making a bawl version of thomas church, and asked him to cut his hair off (this seem not true since he apaired recently in a show with hair) maybe he didnt cut, only used a protese like they do to implant hair or pretend to be bawl in the movies you know.

You mean the protons,neutrons and electrons comment Church made??

Oh yeah that just SCREAMS Chameleon lol.

He's messing with us.He's legally bound not to say anything in way,shape or form that hints to who he is playing.

Everything is made up of protons,neutrons and electrons lol.They are what make up atoms 😉

oh. i though he only said eletrons.......what a b**! teasing us with false statementes.
i hate when he draw a bunch of non existents character and said he wont play him, its like i wont be king kong in the movie, nor tarzan......whew, great......

i believe nothing i hear, although i´d like to see grace as chameleon, and i was wishing for sandman since i saw the endng of sm2, i though that only he could brign so much attention of the police.in the final ,you know, and he is one of the classics.

People keep forgetting about Harry.What do you think he's going to do?? Sit around and do nothing?? Play make a deal with the villain again??

He is going to be a Goblin in SM-3.Count on it.

i dont care for harry, personally i´d love to see him died of O.D .
harry as goblin is the best in comics, but in the movie that gay ruined harry as long as the script ttoo.
ya i can imagine harry sitting in the chair while the suit is burning into the chaminee thing.

we ALL know GG must appear, who cares, we want other villains.

Well Raimi and Co obviously care about Harry.The ending to SM-2 proves that.

yes he seemed really happy at the church..

And he was wearing a green dickie bow 😱

Originally posted by Doc Ock
You mean the protons,neutrons and electrons comment Church made??

Oh yeah that just SCREAMS Chameleon lol.

He's messing with us.He's legally bound not to say anything in way,shape or form that hints to who he is playing.

Everything is made up of protons,neutrons and electrons lol.They are what make up atoms 😉

For the record, theres been more than just that article.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
There he is.

Like a bad smell he's never truly gone.

More personal attacks, attempting to lead me into an arguement or debate as always or just another insult at my expense?

One might start to think you are a troll of some sort...

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
For the record, theres been more than just that article.

Yeah and how many Sandman articles did I show you??

Need to see them again just to 'remind' you???

More personal attacks, attempting to lead me into an arguement or debate as always or just another insult at my expense?

One might start to think you are a troll of some sort...

One would be wrong wouldn't they.

Keep your snide remarks to yourself and I'll do the same.

I don't take crap from anyone 🙂

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Yeah and how many Sandman articles did I show you??

Need to see them again just to 'remind' you???

One would be wrong wouldn't they.

Keep your snide remarks to yourself and I'll do the same.

I don't take crap from anyone 🙂

Let me settle this once and for all as far as those links go.

Link 1) Article was from March.
Link 2) Had nothing more than a sentence and was from May.
Link 3) Was a link to my own site and the articles displayed between mid-May and now were supporting the Chamleon character rather than the other.

There has been NOTHING even hinting at Sandman in the last couple of months meanwhile several strong articles and news have appeared pointing to Chamaleon with more on the way.

'One would be wrong wouldn't they." Perhaps, but thus far your behavior is most certainly saying otherwise.

You've bashed me several times already, so the only "crap" here is definitely not coming from me.

How about "its still up in the air right now" as the solution to this fight? Nothing is official, not Sandman OR Chameleon, so it could be anything. Look at how big Maggie Grace's playing Shadowcat was for X3 and that fizzled out didn't it? So its nothing yet known for sure besides the ones working on the film.

Originally posted by NoFate007
How about "its still up in the air right now" as the solution to this fight? Nothing is official, not Sandman OR Chameleon, so it could be anything. Look at how big Maggie Grace's playing Shadowcat was for X3 and that fizzled out didn't it? So its nothing yet known for sure besides the ones working on the film.

Decent enough point Fate, different situation but I get what your saying.

How about Ock and I agree to disagree because I do have better things to do than to sit here and debate for hours and it is getting rather tiresome.

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet

How about Ock and I agree to disagree because I do have better things to do than to sit here and debate for hours and it is getting rather tiresome.

Nobody is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to reply 🙄

As for your "Several strong articles" you mentioned above.What makes them strong?? Just because they're the latest in a long line of BS rumours we've got??

Please.

Personally I'm still hoping that its neither Sandman, nor Chameleon. Especially not Chameleon, I can't stand him. But I think a lot of villains other than them would work better. Electro could even propose a lot of problems, since he's supposedly rich as far as I can remember (unless my lack of sleep has caught up to me). He can be someone that Peter gets to know, and wants his help for creating some sort of a weapon. Then Peter has a problem that he can't support Mary Jane with his little money, and he ends up working for his current villain, helping him create this machine of doom so to speak. Of course that doesn't have anything to do with what Grace's character could be, nor does Church resemble Electro, but I think that'd be something cool.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Nobody is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to reply 🙄

As for your "Several strong articles" you mentioned above.What makes them strong?? Just because they're the latest in a long line of BS rumours we've got??

Please.

I didn't say anybody was, but when I'm insulted or my posts are ridiculed I'm going to reply.

Calling whatever is heard about Chameleon BS simply because you dislike the character doesn't help your point. The last news story was stronger than the others because it actually came from a credible site unlike some past news stories which were posted by fan sites.

Like I said, why don't you just agree to disagree unless you wish to continue dragging this on forever...

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
I didn't say anybody was, but when I'm insulted or my posts are ridiculed I'm going to reply.

I know too well how that feels. I do the same thing.

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet

Calling whatever is heard about Chameleon BS simply because you dislike the character doesn't help your point. The last news story was stronger than the others because it actually came from a credible site unlike some past news stories which were posted by fan sites.

Like I said, why don't you just agree to disagree unless you wish to continue dragging this on forever...

I don't dislike Chameleon.I just think as a major villain for SM-3 he would be a MAJOR disappointment after Doc Ock.

They need villains that will dazzle the screen and provide great action.Chameleon will not do that.Sandman,Electro,Lizard,any of the Goblins will.But not Chameleon.

I have been disagreeing with you from day 1.Why are we suddenly agreeing to this now???

Anyway I thought you enjoyed a good debate.Just leave out the snide remarks and this will be just fine.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
I know too well how that feels. I do the same thing.

Don't mind Mr Parker.He's harmless really 😉

Originally posted by Doc Ock
I don't dislike Chameleon.I just think as a major villain for SM-3 he would be a MAJOR disappointment after Doc Ock.

They need villains that will dazzle the screen and provide great action.Chameleon will not do that.Sandman,Electro,Lizard,any of the Goblins will.But not Chameleon.

I have been disagreeing with you from day 1.Why are we suddenly agreeing to this now???

Anyway I thought you enjoyed a good debate.Just leave out the snide remarks and this will be just fine.

I suppose that is you opinion on Chameleon being included, just like I have mine.

Why? Because like I told you before I discontinued the debate on July 27th for reasons already mentioned.

I do, but I usually enjoy debating when its a more respectable/civilized debate with no insults and or unecessary comments toward any one side. Actually how about you leave the unasked bashing out next time and if I did say anything "snide" as you so boldly claim then it was likely because of your very nasty behavior towards me.

"agreeing to this now???" In addition to what I said above: It should be obvious by now that I'm not going to convince you the villain may be Chameleon and that your not going to convince me the villain might be Sandman so to continue any further would be merely repeating ourselves countless times.

Fair enough.Then don't respond to me in future if you feel that way.But I will continue to tear down your ideas in a respectful manner 🙂

Anyone who thinks a multi million dollar movie is going to invest in a villain who simply makes himself look like other regular people doesn't know much about superhero movies.

The Chameleon isn't even visually exciting.