Re: Re: Next spiderman villain
Originally posted by captainam
that probably would be a pretty good movie if they do it right.
it could be a really shitty idea 2, and punisher 2 is already being made as we speak. the punisher needs to be rate R. the first one was alright but they could have done alot better had they had an R rating. I think that the villian in spidy3 is going to be sandman and GG2(harry osbourne)and I personally think that they will introduce and actually show Eddie Brock, and possibly towards the end make an apperience of the symbiot. but Venom couldn't be done in one movie, they would have to make at least 2, 3 to make it any good. They have to have spidy in the suit. spidy fighting with the suit*both in the first movie of the venom series* spidy gets rid of suit and goes to eddie broke in the second movie. and then the third if they would take it that far introduce carnage. which they might not even do. plus I read somewhere that the director wants to stay with villians that are both in the modern spidy and classic to bring in a wider audience. personally i love venom, but I love Symbiot Siderman more.
Originally posted by NoFate007
1. Sane, but disturbed
2. Losing his sanity3. Completely insane and sent to an asylum?
Actually I think troubled young man would best describe Harry from the first film.
I agree with Doc Ock,Harry has all ready done the hiring/making a deal with a villain,now the next step is to do it himself.Like Norman said in the first film"If you want something done you have to do it yourself."
After the set ups in the first and second film,I don't Raimi doing a 180 and not having Harry as the Goblin,I believe it will happen.
Will be interesting when all the details are laid out for us late this year or early next year.
It does make sense to have Harry as GG2, after showing that scene at the end...however...marketing-wise it makes no sense at all, and he's stated himself he's not 100% set on going that route. Plus, it makes no sense to have 3 villains in a film at the same time, unless Grace and Church are playing villains that need no backstory - which they obviously aren't, seeing as they're well known enough not to play very minor roles, and they don't look like say, Rhino or Shocker. Am I right?
Well I do think the whole talk about Harry understanding and forgiving Peter is just a bull and a smokescreen.This was a big deal in the comic book,so I can't see Raimi just tossing it aside.
Plus Harry as a villain has everything Sam loves about his villains.What can connect closer and stand in Peter's growth better then his former best friend now wearing the guise of his greatest foe.
I know Grace and Church are both confirmed as baddies in 3 but remember Raimi's quote from last year during the press for Spider-Man 2.
"This won't be your grandfathers Green Goblin,it will be a brand new creation."
If I was a betting man,I would say we will see Harry as the new Green Goblin in some form in 3.
I think they could easily do 3 villain the more you think about it...One way to do it is have Harry just fight Peter once at the end as the big ending to Spiderman 3.Have him just getting angry and being confused about all the green goblin stuff and start telling his liuttle scientists to do something with it.Then they find out what it is tell Harry,he tells them to upgrade or something,then he becomes Green Goblin.-That takes about 20 minutes at the most-The fight between Harry and Peter needs to rock and be about hmmmm the same time as the first gg that was long.
Sandman and Electro lets say.If these are the two then I am almost positive Electro will be the main one.introducing them is about 15 min.(i think)and then you have a lot of time to just show fight scenes,which i think should be peters problem in the movie.it has been about mary jane but now have it that he dont know how to actually beat these guys.show a little aunt may and peter and mj and that would be good.