Villain For Spider-Man 3?

Started by The Ones297 pages

He said the website. as in, killermovies.com

ahh got ya

Originally posted by The Ones
He said the website. as in, killermovies.com
She and he. Doc and I stated it.

I can't believe people are complaining about the inclusion of Venom. Regardless of how they feel, they're all going to get goosebumps when they see the first screenshot of him.

If Gopher is Venom then the only goosebumps they'll get is ones of disgust.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
If Gopher is Venom then the only goosebumps they'll get is ones of disgust.
Ock he will not play the costume itself they arent gonna completely ruin venom and go and paint Topher black and give him a spider painted on his chest the ultimate spiderman had a weak guy as venom and when he got on the costume he was bigger than the original so topher will just play brock himself!!!!

Good point. But I still have to side with Ock. I wont think Grace is good for the role unless I see it first.

Originally posted by amity75
I can't believe people are complaining about the inclusion of Venom. Regardless of how they feel, they're all going to get goosebumps when they see the first screenshot of him.
Who's complaning. This is SpiderMan3 it better kick SPM2's ass or else.

Originally posted by Spideys Sister
Who's complaning. This is SpiderMan3 it better kick SPM2's ass or else.
or else what 😈

Exactly what was wrong with Spider-Man 2?

Nothing, but does anyone want a movie to fail in comparison to its prequel? It better beat #2, cause #2 was freakin great, and if it does, then we're (possibly?) ending off with the best one yet - as movies should do.

Indeed, it's rare that a sequel be a lot better than the original. But that was the case with SM and SM2. But the second sequel being better than the first sequel, which was better than the original, THAT'S a feat in itself.

Exactly. The normal case is that the sequel is either "meh" or not as good as the first. Then the sequel that tops it is rare, but is more easily achieved than the third film topping both. IE, Terminator, T2, and T3. Terminator is great, T2 is the best, T3 sucked.

Back for the OT Star Wars kids, usually people think that it went 5-4-6, I think 5-6-4 however but you know.

Godfather, Godfather 2, Godfather 3 which is almost always excluded
Matrix, and so on.

So its rare, and I'm just hoping that Raimi goes all out and just kicks some ass with this. I want this to be good enough that they say "we'd be stupid not to make 4..."

I like the way you think.

Yes three can be the curse.

And looking at recent 'revelations' it shall be the jinx number for the Spider-Man movies too.

Everyone's been so worried about Venom, what about Sandman? I haven't heard anything about him yet. How bout it, can we shut up about Topher and talk about Church as Sandman? Ock, your presumptions were right. I tip my hat to you, you called it on here first I believe.

Well I am still not taking Dunst's word for it.So I may be wrong about Sandman,though I doubt it.Thomas Haden Church is identical to him.Perfect for the role.

My thoughts on Sandman?? He will be a mere blip on the screen.Robbed of proper screen time.He'll be mere eye candy to a shallow story.

Of course there's always the possibility that Grace isn't playing Venom at all, just Brock. Think about it, if Church were to say: "I'm going to be starring as Flint Marko." The general public would be like: "Who the hell is that?" But if he were to say: "I'm starring as Sandman." People would say: "Hey, Sandman.." See what I'm getting at?

Yeah but none of them have said who they're playing.

Damn secrecy.

Just don't make Gopher be Venom.That's all I ask Raimi.

Spider-Man 3 better not be as bad as Batman Forever...