-=- No Point In Humans -=-

Started by shaber4 pages

How does anyone define an 'error' of the so called 'natural law.' If it works by mutation then it is arbitrary and has no pattern to err from!

Originally posted by shaber
How does anyone define an 'error' of the so called 'natural law.' If it works by mutation then it is arbitrary and has no pattern to err from!

If you eer study Biology, Mutations are erros, and don't last for mroe then 5 generations, becasue most of the time they are not as "healthy" and die early on.

what you are talking about is Evolution, and evolution does take place in a logical way, the Human Genom was not logically evolved,

So every organism is an error of nature then 🙄

the Human Genom was not logically evolved,
says who

look at the evidence 🪩

😕

Did you know that the Human Genom Is an Error of Natur ? Scientist could not trace the Human Genom to anything else before primitive apes
doesnt make it an error cause scientist havent been able to trace it beyond the primates.

Aliens modified the human genome.

Makes as much sense as a deity (maybe more).

Hmmm.....
Beating a videogame as one of life's accomplishments- I like that!

Wars are an excellent example that there is no point in humans......killing each other since the dawn of mankind is proof enough for me. Wars happen then and will happen in the future. Face....humans have no point.

hi

Originally posted by Cipher
Hmmm.....
Beating a videogame as one of life's accomplishments- I like that!

Heh, it is if it's one of the Super Mario Bros games. You needed to be godlike to beat them without cheats or warps. 😆

Wars are an excellent example that there is no point in humans......killing each other since the dawn of mankind is proof enough for me. Wars happen then and will happen in the future. Face....humans have no point
other animals species will kill one of their own to survive

Yeah, but we kill each other for land, money and oil. *cough* George Bush *cough* 😖hifty:

animals kill for territory as well.

lol, you going anywhere with this?

Technically its true, one of any animals primary purposes is to a. pass on its genes and b. insure that its young have a good chance of survival, by say claiming the best land, food sources and so forth.

right on IS

I know it's true guys. But what's your point?

I think they're commenting on the overlap with animals and humans.