Originally posted by Ahnold
A damn shame too. Brosnan was the best Bond in years. He truly was a great "all rounder" Bond; IMHO, he successfully combined the ruggedness and charisma of Connery, the wit of Moore, and the dangerous edge of Dalton. The producers were FOOLS to let him go. Too old for the role? Not a chance! Moore was 57 when he did "AVTOK"! And did you see him in "After The Sunset"? The boy still got the skills.Honestly, when I read about who they're considering as a replacement it makes me despair. Colin Farrel? Ewan McGregor? Ioan Gruffield?!!! Sheesh!
You still reading HOTDOG? 😉
Originally posted by Ahnold
Ah, The Redeemer! Good to see you again!But let's not bring up that unfortunate argument again, eh? I STILL think that Hotdog is reputable {if not, how could it have survived this long?}
Relax!!! As the late Kenny Everet once minced...or was that sang...and I'm *paraphrasing* here..."It WAS all done in the best possible taste!!!"
It's not THAT bad of a mag, BTW!!! 😉
Originally posted by A4E
what? what?! WHAT?!!!WHAT ARE THEY STONED!?!?!??!?!?!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😠
they cant!!! brosnan's such a good bond!!!!! bloody hell!!
bastards!
No they are smart.Brosnan SUCKED as bond big time.He is the worst Bond ever.I tip my caps off to them for finally getting smart if it is indeed true.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
If he really is NOT going to play Bond again,I will celebrate and throw the party of a lifetime.But I wont believe it until it is OFFICIALLY announced that a new actor has been signed on for the role.I dont want to get my hopes up and be let down.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
If he really is NOT going to play Bond again, I will celebrate and throw the party of a lifetime.
He's not. It's been confirmed by PB himself in numerous interviews; he was fired ...
I'm baffled, though; why do you think he was so bad? I thought that he was the best Bond since Moore, if not Connery himself ...