The Pentagon's 9/11... a conspiracy? [merged]

One thing you have to give credit to Michael Moore though... he's got guts. Remember the Republican Convention held in New York? Well, there he was, covering it. I'm not sure who he was representing, but I believe it was "USA Today".
Anyhow, kind of like the lamb to the slaughter, or the Christian in the middle of the Roman Colliseum waiting for the lions to be set free for din din.
He stayed composed, even though thousands of Republican eyes were drilling holes in his body. He'd just smile, and report for an entire week.
Crazy........... 😱
quotagirl

"Okay, first off where does her looks come into play? You have no idea what she likes like, nor does it even matter?"

I said the looks thing as a jab at her, it is irrelevent. I don't know what she looks like, that's why I used the word ASSUME. Open a dictionary, kid.

"That was the stupidest comment I have heard in a long time..."

Obviously, you don't read your own comments if you think that's true.

"Secondly I have watched Fahrenheit 9/11 ONCE and I found all those same points...you do not have to watch it repeated times to know what the movie is saying unless you are really slow or something which might be...It would take me ONE sitting to write what she wrote.."

I'm gonna go ahead and assume you had read some of the generic dribble people have wrote on that film before you watched it, or at least heard some of the comments people had made about it. Funny, you claim you'd be able to write what she wrote in one sitting, yet you can barely keep your thoughts in one post, you always have to go off and add new posts when you're brain later comes up with new ideas that relate to whatever discussion is at hand. Ironic you mention people being slow, when obviously you fit that term like a glove.

"you spend WAY more time coming on here I'm afraid...I don't come on here often and when I do I say what I have to say...and then I don't show up usually for quite some time...but for some reason, your always here when I'm here...Every minute adds up...You've spent way more time on here then that girl did on that review...I'll tell you that..."

I've spent more time here total then that girl spent on her essay!? To hell you say!! Wow, that's quite a revelation considering that I've been an active poster here for 3 years. Congratulations, you can do basic math and figure out that in the 3 years I've been here, I've probably spent more time total here then that fat girl spent on her shitty, redundant essay pointing out the same "points" as all of the other shitty essays that do the same thing.

"I'll tell you that...for all I know your some fat obese guy...I mean the things you say, they couldn't have been written by someone who was thin right?"

You're right, I'm fat! Congrats, it's only evident in the numerous pictures I've posted on this site! But then again, what does my weight have to do with anything? Isn't this comment about my weight irrelevent, just as my comment about that fat girls weight was? Yay hypocracy, you just did the same thing that you were complaining that I did, make a statement about a persons weight when it has nothing to do with anything! Guess you're no better off then I am, and you just equaled my "stupid statement" with your own stupid statement, or just one of many that you've made, I should say.

You're voting for Bush right? Glad to see you found your intelectual equal in the man you're voting for, you two seem destined for eachother, kid.

So that picture right there is of you? Because if it is you really need something done about that? I brought up your looks as a joke, because of what you said about the girl...But HEY, I was just assuming you were fat. I don't care if you were assuming she was fat, you still brought it up as a major and stupid point. I post numerous posts because I'm responding to DIFFERENT people's comments...If I posted it in one, it would all be combined together and too long to read through it...Dude, your bringing up stupid points like how long she spent on it...I think your trying to avoid what she had to say...I'm not gonna persuade you in the way of how long she spent on it...maybe you should email and ask her...but I can tell you a rough and LONG estimate of how long you spend on these forums.

Originally posted by hunchy
So that picture right there is of you? Because if it is you really need something done about that? I brought up your looks as a joke, because of what you said about the girl...But HEY, I was just assuming you were fat. I don't care if you were assuming she was fat, you still brought it up as a major and stupid point. I post numerous posts because I'm responding to DIFFERENT people's comments...If I posted it in one, it would all be combined together and too long to read through it...Dude, your bringing up stupid points like how long she spent on it...I think your trying to avoid what she had to say...I'm not gonna persuade you in the way of how long she spent on it...maybe you should email and ask her...but I can tell you a rough and LONG estimate of how long you spend on these forums.

Like I said, I brought up HER looks as a jab, it was not meant to be a major point in anything. The major point in my statement was that it was dull, boring, redundant and the same crap other people have pointed out that everyone already knows about. The fact that you took the word "fat" as a major point proves that you are unaware of what actual points are. You're point about me being fat however WAS a major point in your post. You made a full sentance about how you thought I was fat, however I said the word Fat and nothing more. You condemn me for saying the word "fat" yet it's okay for you to make a full sentance about how you think I'm fat. Hurray for faulty logic and poor reasoning!

Smart people can make numerous points aimed at numerous people in ONE post. But then again, those people are smart.

I never avoided what she had to say, I already said it was the same stuff all the other people who have challenged the film have said. And it's mostly true. If you remember, I mentioned that the film is blatantly full of shit. Why would I avoid her points if I already recognized the film as being full of crap? Make sense, sometime.

I did not talk all about you being fat in the first sentence...man you sure do see things...And I only mentioned it because you brought it up against her. Don't try to get around it...You were slamming her saying she couldn't possibly be thin and good looking...because she wrote that she must have been ugly...that's what you said...and that's more than assuming...I wouldn't have mentioned anything EVER about your weight normally...And I have nothing against your weight...Hey, I'm skinney...But this is starting to go off topic and we're starting to repeat ourselves, so let's put an end to this discussion...what say you?

Originally posted by BackFire
Everyone knows Farenheight 9/11 is full of shit, we don't need to be told that by some fat 17 year old girl who has nothing better to do then point out the obvious lies and misconceptions that the movie throws at the audience.

That's my original post mentioning her weight. Obviously an assumption, seeing as I don't KNOW that she is a fat ugly girl.

Now here's what you claim "I said" in my first post.

"You were slamming her saying she couldn't possibly be thin and good looking...because she wrote that she must have been ugly...that's what you said."

Keep in mind you're the one that made a big deal about my original, little, trivial statement and got all defensive about it, asking me to elaborate on "why I thought she was fat". I did so, and you got even more defensive and started whining, ironically, like a little 17 year old girl.

"I did not talk all about you being fat in the first sentence...man you sure do see things"

Ah, more shitty reading comprehension on your part. I never said in your FIRST sentance. I said you made a FULL sentance about me being fat, whereas I simply used the word "fat" in my post. You tell me which is more of a major point in a thread. Using the word fat, or making a full sentance.

"And I only mentioned it because you brought it up against her"

But you DID mention it, and made it far more elaborate then I originally did. Thus you did exactly what you're condemning me for. Good work.

"But this is starting to go off topic and we're starting to repeat ourselves, so let's put an end to this discussion...what say you?"

I say that if you don't want to get into stupid arguments, then you shouldn't start them. Then again, stupid arguments, actually, stupid everything seems to be your cup of tea..

Talk about "DIGRESSING" people............ or kiddies?
Get back to the issue, not insulting each other, for heaven's sake.
You just look silly.

Okay...so it goes on...if you wanna play it that way...

In your first sentence you said nothing about assuming her weight...you said she was a far 17 year old girl....just as simply as that...nothing plainer...then you tried to say you were just assuming since you didn't know...well of course you didn't know but you still said it...so you shouldn't say things when your just assuming them and don't know it to be true correct?

"Everyone knows Farenheight 9/11 is full of shit, we don't need to be told that by some fat 17 year old girl who has nothing better to do then point out the obvious lies and misconceptions that the movie throws at the audience."

Then you say:

"Can you picture a young HOT female writing all that generic dribble?"

Well you really can't tell until you see her in person...Assuming or not assuming. I also did not go on and on about being fat.

I said this:
"But HEY, I was just assuming you were fat"...that's a lot about talking about your weight...again seeing things...I wasn't getting defensive about the girl's weight...I really don't care about her weight...but its stupid to say that when you don't know and don't tell me otherwise...You started this argument by saying that she was stupid and (ASSUMED she was) fat and how she spent tons of time on writing the article.

I wouldn't say he has guts...I would say he's an ******* who just likes to piss people off...why else would he just happen to go to the Republican National Convention...The Christian in the middle of the Roman Collisuem...That's what Michael Moore said about himself...but how funny seeing as though he's not Christian and the Republicans are not really like Romans...A lot of Republicans happen to be Christian in fact...Bad comparison really. Moore just smiles because what else is he gonna do? He knows nothing will happen to him and that he's smug up in his top row seat....

"One thing you have to give credit to Michael Moore though... he's got guts. Remember the Republican Convention held in New York? Well, there he was, covering it. I'm not sure who he was representing, but I believe it was "USA Today".
Anyhow, kind of like the lamb to the slaughter, or the Christian in the middle of the Roman Colliseum waiting for the lions to be set free for din din.
He stayed composed, even though thousands of Republican eyes were drilling holes in his body. He'd just smile, and report for an entire week.
Crazy...........
quotagirl"

Um a little plane would'nt make that big explosion they new it was a big plane because all of it scattered all over the damn place and I know because I had family that was working in the pentigon that day and they said that he who I cannot name tripped over pieces believe me it was big plane plus the fire was very hot.

It's just a conspiracy exactly...and what a stupid one...

It's just amazing how film can be manipulated. Add dramatic music, fast speeding clips, repetitive photos, and you've got a lot of puzzled folk.

Anyways hunchy. I love the Michael Moore's of the world. He's definitely an egotist, but he makes you "Question Authority". And that's what it's all about if you believe in your "Freedom of Speech"

I like the Micheal Moore's of the world. They also create a reason for Trey and Matt to make a puppet film showing Micheal Moore as a fat crazy guy who wants to be like those stoned faces in Mount Rushmore. Alot of symbolism with his head lined right up with the head of Washington, like he was a 5th head trying to lead America. Then he blows him self up inside it, which shows something else. His approach to showing what he thinks can also hurt the people he thinks he is helping (the people who have supposedly been hurt by Bush).

Micheal Moore reads like a hypocrite. But that is who you have to be if you are to criticize and not take any responsibility for what you are criticizing.

is it certain it was a jumbo jet that was hijacked

original posted by PVS
yes, 4 jumbos were hijacked.

There wasnt any jumbojets,
AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHT 77 that hit Pentagon was a Boeing 757
picture of Boeing 757

AMERICAN AIRLINE FLIGHT 11 that was the first plane to hit the TWC was Boeing 767picture of boeing 767

UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT 175 that hit the second tower of TWC was a a Boeing 767

UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT 93 that crashed in Pennsylvania was a Boeing 757

Jumbojets are 747`s and a much bigger plane than the 4 hijacked planes
picture of 747 jumbo jet

i always thought 767 and 757 were also considered jumbos...hmmm

oh well...my mistake then, thanks for the correction.

Some people think it was a tomahawk missil that hit the pentagon

"the best lies, the ones that work have a strong kernel of truth to them"

This is a quote by Michael Moore himself in the documentary "Michael Moore Hates America" and no, this movie is not bashing him. Just doing to him what he does to others, and funny how he won't be in the movie...quota girl, your right movies can be manipulated very easily...I'm glad you agree on that...But it seems the guy making this movie on Michael Moore, shows you what Michael Moore has to say WITHOUT lying...There's no conspiracies about him or anything...just the truth...and that's why I want to see it...Yes, questing authority is freedom of speech...and it is good to a point...but then there's some people who just think that anyone with authority is evil...it's the basis for being a punk...and being anti-government and anti-war and anti this and anti that...like I said, its good to a point...and then some go overboard...Kingcoot, I couldn't have put it better. Moore is a "hypocrite" and well a down-right liar. And as for the tomahawk missle, that's complete bullshit...When will you people stop trying to find new conspiracy theories...it was a plane that hit the Pentagon...you think everyone that saw it happen lied about it and said it was a missle. I don't think so.

http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php#Main

Heard of this... There was a site that was trying to debunk all the various conspiracy theories about the Pentagon thing, and I have to say, that article was much more convincing than the conspiracy theories.

This is the...

50th repost! Woo!