Originally posted by Mr Zero
But if I'm hearing this right - any movie that has a SF element to the horror isn't a horror movie it's SF? And because only a few of Cronenbergs films fall within your definition he isn't "full-fledged" enough?
You're not following. Crony belongs in a best directors PERIOD poll. As do Hitchcock and Raimi. In essence, this being the Horror forum and all, I figured nods for the title would be reserved for those whos life works mainly reside in the genre? He's a great director, just not a typical director with which you'd hear in a Horror genre word association.
As for Romero. There's not much more than a 4 second blurp on the radio to "establish" the zombies origin in NOTLD. In any case, that's a subplot, not the main story. I'll say it, as a director, I feel Romero is overrated. He belongs in such a list, but wouldn't be in my poll, and for good reason.
John Carpenter..
..if we disallow his "non traditional and sci fi tinged" work you are saying is the greatest horror director on the strength of Halloween, The Fog and Christine.
Lest we forget "Vampires", "In the Mouth of Madness", and "Prince of Darkness"? That's quite a resume. Who did you vote for? Do tell.
See, there's no biased, there's you people trying to force square pegs in round holes, and then there is what actually fits.
Carpenter fits. Like butta.