Lifeforce vs. Dawn of the Dead remake.

Started by Johnlindsey2891 pages

Lifeforce vs. Dawn of the Dead remake.

Which is the bettter running fast zombie flick? can you compare both? or did "Dawn of the Dead" didn't had any nude alien vampire hotties?

you could have included 28 days later. however, the dotd remake wiped the floor with lifeforce.

i would go 28 days later as well followed ny the new Dawn.

Dawn of the Dead (and 28 Days Later) to me are the best zombie flicks (and horror flicks with depth) of late. They are the best (and I have to say Shaun of the Dead as well, they are the unstoppable Triad).

Dawn by far.

Well, "28 Days Later" isn't a zombie flick, neither is "Lifeforce", as there were no zombies, so "Dawn of the Dead" wins by default.

...and just to clarify, the "zombies" in "Lifeforce" are just people who are dying. Zombies are dead/undead, and the dead in "Lifeforce" turn to ash when they die.

cinema you always seem to make the sun go down (:

dawn of the dead remake was so bad i am speechless to describe such a let down. This movie was bad on all accounts. The only good part of the film was the first ten minutes. they should have just looped the first ten minutes into a two hour long movie with some porno shots thrown in. this would have been a better attempt at what we got.

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
dawn of the dead remake was so bad i am speechless to describe such a let down. This movie was bad on all accounts. The only good part of the film was the first ten minutes. they should have just looped the first ten minutes into a two hour long movie with some porno shots thrown in. this would have been a better attempt at what we got.

care to expaned on anything other than it sux on all accounts?

i thought the remake kicked ass.
if it was a stand alone film aka without the dawn of the dead title, i think it would be remembered as one of the great zombie films from this decade.