I dont know man, i mean why? Also, it says that Campbell is producing, it doesnt say if he is to star. Evel dead 2 can basically be chalked up as a remake. Or atleast an elaboration of the same events that occured in the first film. It seems like a decesion to get a new audience to the films rather than trying to make another film to appeal to the already large following audience that they have. Without Raimi not directing, half of it's potential is already out the window, If campbell is not starring then there would be no reason for it to be made.
It really does seem that making a remake is to grab new commers to the films. I mean, i dont want to see ash go from being a whiny average joe to becomming the bad ass creature killer he is all over again. Or maybe Raimi is so busy with Spiderman, and wants to answer the fans call for another appearance of ash so does the next best thing and produces one, but without bruce it is nohting.
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
I give up. Just remake NOES and Friday the 13th, screw my girlfriend and then spit in my eye.Kill my cat, too. Is nothing sacred in cinema?
He's not, and he probably wont.
Ah, well with that information then I have to switch my prior feelings. They shouldn't do it.
i suppose if Raimi is to busy to work on it and bruce dosn't want to be part of it, then it'd be easier to simple remake the origonal then preduce a whole 4th movie. and really, do you want a Evil Dead movie thats part of the series made as an origonal by someone else with someone else as ash. no way
how can they even think about doing this, i heard raimi halted 'freddy vs. jayson vs. ash' because he wanted to keep the options open for that character, if all he is doing is re'making evil dead he shud hav let 'fv.jv.a' come to pass, i just wanto see a conclusion to the directorial ending of army of darkness, 'fv.jv.a' might have done that, once i heard he stoped it and why i was all "hot digity damn- evil dead 4!!" but now i dont think ill ever see this conclusion, im soo distrought