Originally posted by Aku
Halo sucks anyway. They should make a film about Killzone now ya talking. More depth and action. It would be an epic to save the world.
Originally posted by dark1365
My friend bought it for PS2...he said that the story sucked. The only reason he bought it is because he didn't have an Xbox(so no Halo 2) so he tried to buy the best available FPS for PS2. We've played both Killzone and Halo 2 multiplayer, and we both agreed that Halo 2 was better. Way better matchmaking online.
good for your mate.
1. its not on PS2
2. The story doesnt suck.
3. The story rocks and the film will rock and i cant ****ing wait!!!
Originally posted by McBane
Who cares Xbox dont have San Andreas or Gran Turismo.
Playstation get all the great GREAT titles first.
Halo was so crappy and slow to play. i was bored with it in minutes.
Now Half-Life - There's a FPS series to credit.
Gaz
Well that's your problem, if you only played Halo for the first few minutes of course it was slow, you didn't even have a weapon. And yeah, PS2 gets all the good games first, that's why it gets KOTOR and KOTOR 2 first, and got Escape from Butcher Bay first, and got MechAssault first, and got the first Splinter Cell first, and got the much better Ghost Recon 2. Oh wait it didn't. Except for Ghost Recon 2, it didn't even get any of those games, yet Xbox got both of the previous GTAs. 🙄
Originally posted by dark1365Your right that halo 2 is better multi player but as far as campaign mode's i have to say holo 2 or 1 blows. i hate the story plus its way to repetitive way to fast. i have a x-box and PS2 and i have to say at least the first 10 mins of kill zone is as close i have got to love a first person shooter just because kill Zone start is so intense and realistic with the bunkers and the bullets flying every were.
My friend bought it for PS2...he said that the story sucked. The only reason he bought it is because he didn't have an Xbox(so no Halo 2) so he tried to buy the best available FPS for PS2. We've played both Killzone and Halo 2 multiplayer, and we both agreed that Halo 2 was better. Way better matchmaking online.
Originally posted by cal31I beat the first halo and was about half way done the 2nd game, and im sorry but it is pretty slow as in they slowed down the running, but other wise once you get to play as the alien guy, it does get faster but speed doesn't fix the rest of this sleep fest game. oh and PS2 doesn't need a sad excuse of a RPG like KOTOR, or 2. i have played both of those and i have to say that game leaves a huge gap to desire, i was expecting way more form a RPG but it was just a bad game hiding behind this supposed RPG label. And guess what i have played both Ghost recon games and there both better in there own way, like PS2 is more stealthy, were the x-box version seems to be more go and shoot (much like raimbow6 3). And as far as splinter cell goes x-box can have it,Any Metal Gear Solid game can own that series.
Well that's your problem, if you only played Halo for the first few minutes of course it was slow, you didn't even have a weapon. And yeah, PS2 gets all the good games first, that's why it gets KOTOR and KOTOR 2 first, and got Escape from Butcher Bay first, and got MechAssault first, and got the first Splinter Cell first, and got the much better Ghost Recon 2. Oh wait it didn't. Except for Ghost Recon 2, it didn't even get any of those games, yet Xbox got both of the previous GTAs. 🙄
Originally posted by McBane
Who cares Xbox dont have San Andreas or Gran Turismo.
Playstation get all the great GREAT titles first.
Halo was so crappy and slow to play. i was bored with it in minutes.
Now Half-Life - There's a FPS series to credit.
Gaz
What are you talking about? GTA San Andreas is coming for the Xbox in May of 2005. Also Half-Life 2 is NOT on the PS2 is for PC and is heading for the Xbox as well.