rate the sig of the person above you.

Originally posted by soin2cal
rated😄

same😄

rated

9- great effort put into that!

Originally posted by Swe_Bum
rated

7.5 nice but needs better blending on the lighter areas.

What color do you think would look right there? I think the blending is just fine, though didnt want to ruin it by putting a lot more blends into it LOL!

I wasn't talking to you hence my quoting Swe. Besides I already told you what needs work on yours.

Oh sorry. Repeat what you personally think needs improving😛
I do not think the blending is a problem on mine.

1

WTF that is going beyond stupidness now. I know LA doesnt appeal to everyone but its certainly worth more than one as it looks a good sig no matter whether you love LA or not. I think 3 maybe but not 1. My sig kind of stands out, has a little blend, nice picture, certainly worth average in anyones eyes, you do not have to like LA. I love the look to it. I partly made that which is something.

Originally posted by Eclipso
You need a border on it and lower opacity on your blends. What program do you use for editing them?

Oh i use photoshop.
Lowe capacity, why would you think that😄?
I do not know how to do borders, it seems fine without one though in my eyes. Also i am just in the size restriction therefore adding a border would cover half the picture up.

If it seems fine to you then why do you care so much about what we think?

Originally posted by soin2cal
WTF that is going beyond stupidness now. I know LA doesnt appeal to everyone but its certainly worth more than one as it looks a good sig no matter whether you love LA or not. I think 3 maybe but not 1. My sig kind of stands out, has a little blend, nice picture, certainly worth average in anyones eyes, you do not have to like LA. I love the look to it. I partly made that which is something.

I don't rate on how you like it, I rate it on how good it actually is.

Because no ones sig, unless it is completely plain, is worth just 1! The picture or the blurrness is fine on this sig, there is detail on the sig therefore i just dont understand. It looks fine! But the sig is actually good partly. Not many faults.

Originally posted by soin2cal
Because no ones sig, unless it is completely plain, is worth just 1! The picture or the blurrness is fine on this sig, there is detail on the sig therefore i just dont understand. It looks fine! But the sig is actually good partly. Not many faults.

No.

You're sig isn't good, thats why it got a 1.

It isnt rubbish either! It is even worse now that i have put a border on it.
What is rubbish on it? Nothing! the picture is clear, the writing is too. It not rubbish what so ever! Well its ok, if not great! The look certainly isnt rubbish, unless there is a good explaining to how!

2 ermm

Soin,

Vinny is prolly the best judge of sigs on here. Half the time he gives me bad ratings and I listen to him and go back to the drawing board and usually I come back with a better sig because of it. (Thanks Vinny 😏)

If you ask for people's opinions you have to be ready to listen to what they say and accept it. Don't get depressed or mad, just move on and try to make a better sig next time.

I do not mind at all on opinions. But when it is rated 1, for absolutely no reason, there is lol.
There is nothing rubbish about it, because a rubbish sig is plain, doesnt look good, mine is, even f its not great! There is a reason to everything! It stands out, that is what makes it look good, the picture iself, which isnt bad, you yoursel do not rate it as 1 because it has a goodness to it aswell as a bad.If you personally hate this sig because its not your thing, thats fine🙂 Though i like being noted what isnt actually good on it if thats what you think so that i can improve it. The picture itself cannot be improved anymore however. It just appeals to me as i love the city pic inside of it and the blending. But i do not think many would rat it just one, they think its ok.