rate the sig of the person above you.

Started by Mairuzu3,342 pages

thats how i do it, actually i did a lot of work since i used paint...

made the border
adjusted the image...

and tried to blend it in 😛

Originally posted by Mairuzu
thats how i do it, actually i did a lot of work since i used paint...

made the border
adjusted the image...

and tried to blend it in 😛

And I respect that, because you don't make it look shit. Sure, your sigs are blurry, but that's Paint's fault. For a paint user, you make good sigs.

8

Well, somehow its the same quality as the original picture...

8.5 i likez it hmm

Hahaha, 10

10, only because I'm in it.

7

Rate this:

8

8.

And yeah, I'm with GF. But c' mon. Even though I judge sigs not by their looks, but by the technical skill applied on them, to anyone who is not familiar with sigmaking, techincal skill means nothing. As long as it looks good in their eyes.

9

Originally posted by Badwolf
A five, oh my god that's kinda laughable for the effort that was put into it.

I would at least gave it a 7, but i dont judge sigs by the maker.


Originally posted by Cpt. Valerian
to anyone who is not familiar with sigmaking, techincal skill means nothing

Badwolf, this is why you totally shouldnt take RJs ratings serious.

Mairuzu you say you made that in paint? how the hell? awesome
9, i like it more than the yellow version TGF posted

Haha i wish i made this current one in paint, i made a james bond one in paint....

i told TGF to make me sig of arthas, he showed me the yellow version, it was good but i wanted the original colors

then he changed it back, yours is 9

8

Originally posted by Mairuzu
its all matter of opinion anyways, who cares
EXACTLY.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
Maybe you should think about the effort and skill put in.

If her sig's bad, what the hell is yours?

you get 0, because you just copy pasted an image, and it's all blurry too. Anybody could make the crap you call 'sigs'.

OK haermm Am I supposed to give a good rating just because someone put alot of work into a sig but I dont really care for the end result?

Ad the whole "rating sigs my sigmaker" is bullshit. Scythe and I arent exactly buxom buddies and I regularly give him a 10, because his sigs usually kick ass. I rate honestly, maybe I am not as qualified as say Mywi or Speed, or say Piggle, because they are masters, but does that mean I am not supposed to rate at all?

10

10, Piggle does great work.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
OK haermm Am I supposed to give a good rating just because someone put alot of work into a sig but I dont really care for the end result?

Ad the whole "rating sigs my sigmaker" is bullshit. Scythe and I arent exactly buxom buddies and I regularly give him a 10, because his sigs usually kick ass. I rate honestly, maybe I am not as qualified as say Mywi or Speed, or say Piggle, because they are masters, but does that mean I am not supposed to rate at all?

Yeah, you should. I'll give a sig a good rating even if the person didn't do that great a job but really put their best into it, because that to me shows potential.

Badwolf's sig, I can tell a mile off, is well made. How about you go beyond just looking at the image and thinking "i dunt like it lolol 5", is that how you see art? Just a painting? Plenty of great works of art I don't really care for, but however, it's well made either way.

"Not as qualified as..." Haha, you're not qualified at all. You're not even a sigmaker. Seriously.

0. No effort, care, or skill used at all. Probably slapped up under a minute.

8

9

7

really dark, 6.5