Originally posted by SpyCspider
Dracula....definitely not that formidable-looking except when he turned into the beastly form. Like a previous poster said, this is THE FIRST vampire...and when he assumed human form, that's the best he can come up with? Some naked dude charging with a sword? Very second rate to Deacon Frost or Lomack (sp.). I even preferrred Van Helsing's Dracula to this guy.
Yes the movie contains so much plotholes, like vampire's strenght level and full origin of DRAKE, not Dracula DRAKE.They are not the same character.Also Goyer make too much mistakes, Hannibal King conserve some of vampires strenght after getting transformed back into a human but they don't explain how Whistler's daughter can be so much badass.
Anyway i hope in Blade 4 there were clarifications about Drake and vampires come back strong and angry and Blade has more screen time.
Originally posted by IRTMU-Dragon
I didnt like how they portrayed dracula...
Why the hell was he running away from blade? Wasnt he suppose to be all powerful?
It's DRAKE NOT DRACULA.
Drake run to test Blade, how he really wants to stop him, it was a mental test, a will power test we can say.
Drake is a mix of Varnae, the Lord Of All Vampires, First Vampire in Marvel Universe and MU Supreme Sorcerer.
They only give Drake the shapshifting abilities, the uber strenght, the daywalking ability that Varnae doesn't have and make him looking like a human, what Spy said it's wrong.A guy with a sword?Blade and him fight tough, yes when he change in beast form more tough but their fight was not so much lacking of strong hits from the two fighters.
Drake was in Class 3/4 of Strenght in human form, double in beast form.
You see how Blade's punches dealed at him when he starts to change in beast form doesn't works he just take his shots and then shatter him in the ground and the walls.