Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What Do You Believe God Would Be Like?
Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Perhaps. But one aspect of humanity has, for many, been that curiosity. That hunger for understanding. Leaving a great big unanswered question just sitting there is distracting. People will ponder it. The best way to stop questioning is to give/find the answer. The answer I think could very well help in the advancement of love - because as I said - where you have a unknown answer you tend to get two or more camps (depending on its nature) coming up with what they think is the answer, and the division between them can be anything from tense to violent. And who is right? Which group should people trust? It goes on and on. An answer given can remove the potential for conflict - for most at least.
Unless of course man is meant to learn and not be told everything.
I don't believe that well mannered debate is evil, I would believe it is good. I don't believe the division you have described has occurred in relation to the idea of creation. Science has been very congenial in their discussion of the topic. Religious fanatics are the ones that have caused divisiveness on the subject by believing that God used some "supernatural" means of creation to the exclusion of scientific evidence, and wantonly attacking science based solely on lack of explanation in religious text. This is error that the Bible does not support. The potential for conflict is based in the pride of religious zealots, not in the text or message of the Bible, and not in the scientific community. Science is the study of the natural order of things, a natural order that a religious person following the Bible must accept as being part of God's creation.