Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
😕 How could you possibly end up with that reading of what I wrote?
😕
How could you possibly not realize the implications of what you posted?
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I am aware of the unknown. I know that the unknown is a thing because I know there are things I don't know. Because of this I can be afraid of it.On the other hand if I do not have knowledge of something I cannot be afraid of it because I don't know it exists. Name one thing you have never heard of that you're scared of. Imagine an infant. Is the infant scared of werewolves? No, it has no idea that werewolves are a category of things that it is possible to be afraid of.
Because you typed that all out, me thinks you actually understood and comprehended the implications of what you had said.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos😕
This is what I referred to as the "generic mugger". I cannot be afraid of the specific mugger because I have not imagined (arguably cannot) the specific mugger.
I am unsure how that actually addressed what I posted to what you posted.