Originally posted by Misty Girl
Me yesterday afternoon:
I question that this is an actual pic. The quality is miles above every other digital camera used to post on this thread. The apparent age, the lighting and pose of the girl would more likely leave one to believe that this was taken off someone's website.
Sorry to be so sceptical, but we on the internet here and to take everything at face value is a tad bit naive.
I may be wrong, but I gotta a gut feeling that I am not.
Originally posted by KharmaDog
I question that this is an actual pic. The quality is miles above every other digital camera used to post on this thread. The apparent age, the lighting and pose of the girl would more likely leave one to believe that this was taken off someone's website.Sorry to be so sceptical, but we on the internet here and to take everything at face value is a tad bit naive.
I may be wrong, but I gotta a gut feeling that I am not.
you're not alone 😬
because that girl is definitely not 21.
Originally posted by KharmaDog
I question that this is an actual pic. The quality is miles above every other digital camera used to post on this thread. The apparent age, the lighting and pose of the girl would more likely leave one to believe that this was taken off someone's website.Sorry to be so sceptical, but we on the internet here and to take everything at face value is a tad bit naive.
I may be wrong, but I gotta a gut feeling that I am not.
maybe you would like to back that up with that little rectangular part of the picture at the bottom that looks cut out........detective
Originally posted by KharmaDog
I question that this is an actual pic. The quality is miles above every other digital camera used to post on this thread. The apparent age, the lighting and pose of the girl would more likely leave one to believe that this was taken off someone's website.Sorry to be so sceptical, but we on the internet here and to take everything at face value is a tad bit naive.
I may be wrong, but I gotta a gut feeling that I am not.
wouldn't be the first 😊
Originally posted by KharmaDog
I question that this is an actual pic. The quality is miles above every other digital camera used to post on this thread. The apparent age, the lighting and pose of the girl would more likely leave one to believe that this was taken off someone's website.Sorry to be so sceptical, but we on the internet here and to take everything at face value is a tad bit naive.
I may be wrong, but I gotta a gut feeling that I am not.
I'd say I have to agree...her profile says she's 20 but in that pic she looks like she's 16, tops.
Why do people feel the need to post fake pics? 🙄