The Official Members Picture Thread!

Originally posted by Schecter
its funny how you consistantly reply in an attempt to stop me from replying. you could just shut up and then i'll shut up. no, you're right. too simple. thats just what they'd expect us to do.

Originally posted by Schecter
well, dont get me wrong chill, im not picking sides. im just damning the act of hypocritical ass kissing/trolling. in fact i havent been following the actual argument at all.

reverse psychology for the fail

It's pretty much where it started to be honest, REX gave me what I only can assume is a warning, and for some reason RJ felt it his place to step in, and analyse my query of the warning. With all those petty shouts of ''oh, I've known REX for ages''. Which, to be honest does nothing to quail my suspicions of biased on REX's part.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
right back at you.

difference: im not playing the role of jr. deputy moderator. in fact all the hypocrisy and teachers pet politics seems to be on your side of the court. so you see, you are therefore morally obligated to shut up, given your self-appointed role.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
It's pretty much where it started to be honest, REX gave me what I only can assume is a warning, and for some reason RJ felt it his place to step in, and analyse my query of the warning. With all those petty shouts of ''oh, I've known REX for ages''. Which, to be honest does nothing to quail my suspicions of biased on REX's part.

now you are accusing him of playing faves. sure. yeah. 😆 never said we were buddies, just that I know of him.

Yeah, you've known him for ages. Well done.

Jesus christ, can you walk and talk at the same time?

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Yeah, you've known him for ages. Well done.

Jesus christ, can you walk and talk at the same time?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
yup, chew gum and do math in my head too.

hmm, thats about your 10th off-topic post in a row. not a good start for a jr deputy mod.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
yup, chew gum and do math in my head too.

Right great, but to be honest RJ, I don't really want to see your name on my screen anymore. Your opinion on this matter means absolutely nothing to me, as you neither enforce it or abide it.
I don't want a parrot here either (I know it's what you're good at, I'm sorry).

Originally posted by Schecter
hmm, thats about your 10th off-topic post in a row. not a good start for a jr deputy mod.

BTW: I wouldnt be a mod if they begged me to.

Originally posted by Schecter
hmm, thats about your 10th off-topic post in a row. not a good start for a jr deputy mod.

correction, that would be about 22 irrelevant posts and 0 relevant posts in the last 4 pages alone. not a good start at all. this wont likely fair well on your employee review.

Originally posted by Schecter
correction, that would be about 22 irrelevant posts and 0 relevant posts in the last 4 pages alone. not a good start at all. this wont likely fair well on your employee review.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
guess you guys aren't counting your own. I'd say it's about equal.

i dont recall ever claiming to be above that sort of thing, nor claiming to be immune to forum rules based on friendship with a moderator, as you clearly imply by backing up a mod for warning about flaming, and dishing out flames, on the same page no less.

at what point have I claimed to be immune to forum rules?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
you are going head to head with a Moderator, a well respected one at that. It's a losing battle.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi

Do us all a favor and stop having delusions of adequacy.

rightous claim of supporting warning against flames (which you took part in as well) followed by an insult. on the same page.

Originally posted by Schecter
i dont recall ever claiming to be above that sort of thing, nor claiming to be immune to forum rules based on friendship with a moderator, as you clearly imply by backing up a mod for warning about flaming, and dishing out flames, on the same page no less.

There's nothing wrong with being friends with a moderator. Moderators want to be accepted, too. They may want to have conversations with the other registered users.

You've just been incredibly presumptuous, RJ. As you always are.

Originally posted by Ozone
There's nothing wrong with being friends with a moderator. Moderators want to be accepted, too. They may want to have conversations with the other registered users.

i know that. nothing wrong at all. however to turn around and dish out insults immediately after claiming to be against flaming is somehow kosher? and keep in mind i never made any implications about rex. im simply addressing RJ's implications through his actions. lets not get the point twisted, as its pretty cut n dry.

when two members are involved in a heated dispute and a mod feels that only one side should be warned, fine. so be it. lets just brush all accusations of favoritism aside.

however when the opposing party turns around and continues to bait them, while stating over and over that they are buddies with the mod, they are doing no favors for anyone. not for their opponent, not for the mod, not for anyone but themselves (in some twisted way i cannot fathom)

if he truly was aiming at a return to topic he would have not continued to bait.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
You've just been incredibly presumptuous, RJ. As you always are.

Originally posted by Schecter
rightous claim of supporting warning against flames (which you took part in as well) followed by an insult. on the same page.

Originally posted by Schecter
i know that. nothing wrong at all. however to turn around and dish out insults immediately after claiming to be against flaming is somehow kosher? and keep in mind i never made any implications about rex. im simply addressing RJ's implications through his actions. lets not get the point twisted, as its pretty cut n dry.

when two members are involved in a heated dispute and a mod feels that only one side should be warned, fine. so be it. lets just brush all accusations of favoritism aside.

however when the opposing party turns around and continues to bait them, while stating over and over that they are buddies with the mod, they are doing no favors for anyone. not for their opponent, not for the mod, not for anyone but themselves (in some twisted way i cannot fathom)

if he truly was aiming at a return to topic he would have not continued to bait.