Originally posted by Robtard
Derogatory? We're talking about commonly practiced sexual acts.
Irrelevant. You missed the actual point of the post.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Doesn't follow. If anything that would be an admittance of being asexual. But even then, it's still not a good joke.
You're missing the point. If taking teh cauk in the ass and mouth would make a women more equal(to men) in your eyes, you indirectly admitted to being bisexual. 😐
Originally posted by dadudemon
You're missing the point. If taking teh cauk in the ass and mouth would make a women more equal(to men) in your eyes, you indirectly admitted to being bisexual. 😐
Incorrect. I didn't say that taking cock in the ass and mouth makes them more equal, I said I treat them equal by not giving them a free pass to not being made fun of. So, yeah, missing the point, once more, is just one in this conversation, and it is you.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Incorrect. I didn't say that taking cock in the ass and mouth makes them more equal,
I agree...however, my lame joke was a play on your words.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I said I treat them equal by not giving them a free pass to not being made fun of.
Incorrect. You never said that or implied it. However, you did say:
Originally posted by Bardock42
They want to be treated equal. That's just what I am doing.
"They" is who? Since you responded to my question about "women", women=they. If not, you illogically responded to my post with you pronoun reference.
The problem comes with ending it on "equal". Equal to whom? Since we were talking about women, it is usually implied that it is equal to men.
Therefore, you thought that being treated equal to men meant taking cauk in the mouth in buttocks. Ergo, you are at least bisexual. Capisce?
Originally posted by Bardock42
So, yeah, missing the point, once more, is just one in this conversation, and it is you.
Keep telling that to yourself...😉
Originally posted by Robtard
I see what you did there?
Obviously not.
*sigh*
I was being a smartass in my post because you asked for not to say "teh coolies" anymore. I agreed to it. I said "teh cooliez" instead. That was the point of the post.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Blah, blah, my ego is to big for my intelligence, blah
Originally posted by dadudemon
"They" is who? Since you responded to my question about "women", women=they. If not, you illogically responded to my post with you pronoun reference.The problem comes with ending it on "equal". Equal to whom? Since we were talking about women, it is usually implied that it is equal to men.
Therefore, you thought that being treated equal to men meant taking cauk in the mouth in buttocks. Ergo, you are at least bisexual. Capisce?
Your question was "So I guess talking about women in a derogatory way is teh cooliez? I can't believe you guys."
"They" is women
"being treated equal" is talking about them in a derogatory way
"to whom they are being treated equal" is everyone, in particular men.
"you" is being owned
Originally posted by dadudemon
blah, blah, I talk some more cause I get a boner thinking about my idiotic arguments and inane reasonings, blah
Originally posted by dadudemon
Obviously not.*sigh*
I was being a smartass in my post because you asked for not to say "teh coolies" anymore. I agreed to it. I said "teh cooliez" instead. That was the point of the post.
Oh, the hardships of being you, sigh away, Dadudemon, sigh away.
Did it ever occure to you that I was simply ignoring your "teh coolies" remark on the grounds that if I commented on it again, it would only promote yet another round of it?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Your question was "So I guess talking about women in a derogatory way is teh cooliez? I can't believe you guys.""They" is women
"being treated equal" is talking about them in a derogatory way
"to whom they are being treated equal" is everyone, in particular men.
Thank you for agreeing with me. You just said what I said. You obviously don't understand how this plays into your being bisexual. Don't sweat it...not everyone is "teh cooliez".
Originally posted by Bardock42
"you" is being owned
Actually, you just owned yourself.
Originally posted by Robtard
Oh, the hardships of being you, sigh away, Dadudemon, sigh away.Did it ever occure to you that I was simply ignoring your "teh coolies" remark on the grounds that if I commented on it again, it would only promote yet another round of it?
No, because that wasn't the case and you know it. You are not the all seeing all knowing person you'd like everyone to believe. Stop playing like you are.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No, because that wasn't the case and you know it. You are not the all seeing all knowing person you'd like everyone to believe. Stop playing like you are.
But it seems you are the "all seeing and all knowing person", hence you telling it, like it apparently is. Quick, what am I thinking right now?