That's wrong, I am afraid.
Anakin is indeed the Chosen One but destroying the Jedi has nothing to do with bringing balance to the Force; this has always been a very odd idea that some people hold.
As GL has made clear, it is the SITH who unbalance the Force. It is the destructiion of the Sith that restored the Balance.
But the corruption of Anakin meant that he failed, at first, in his destiny and wiped out the Jedi first.
Luke pulled off a blinder by allowing Anakin, as GL put it, to 'reflect on his life' and destroy the Emperor.
If Anakin had wiped out the Sith without destroying the Jedi, then balance would have been created with far fewer problems. But the story would have been far less interesting.
I've never understood the view that the Jedi had to be wiped out to restore balance; it's a very over-literal interpretation of the word. But are we meant to think that Luke will now create an equal amount of dark side and light side Jedi? Of course not!
The Light Side brings balance, the dark side destroys it. Only the evil Sith abuse the Force so. It is only they wo create the imbalance.
thats why i believe the EU is bull shit.
the chosen one destroy the last sith lord and then there is balance to the force
there are no resurrected emperors and other sith apprentices left alive. the prophecy may speak only for "the one who will bring balance to the force" then if the prophecy comes true, anakin should be the one who destroys the last sith. there are no more eu´s stupid sith apprentices and resurrected emperors after anakin´s death. coz then the prophecy would be pointless.
but the "specific time " you talk about would have to be rather a long time. because then i dont get the whole point of the big prophecy if its not going to last. it would be like there never was this chosen one who brings balance to the force.
and anyway you say there is balance in the force when the sith are gone because they´re the ones who disbalance the force. how would anakin bring balance to the force if there is still xizor mara jade and a resurrected emperor?
thats why most of EU doesn´t match with many purposes and meanings of starwars.
Anakin is the chosen one, because it is he who defeats Darth Sideous. Luke isn't powerful enough to waste the emperor, his role is to redeem his father. A very cool story if you think about it, because if Anakin had followed Jedi code and remained celibate, then the Emperor would never have been defeated. Anakin HAD to impregnate Padme, he had to turn to the dark side to "infiltrate" Palpatine's graces and earn his trust, without being so reckless and impulsive, Anakin would never have brought balance to the force.
It's not speculation, it's what happened. It's the story.
You're the one speculating when you say that Anakin could have destroyed the Sith without falling to the dark side. That didn't happen and is thus speculation. Get it?
The interesting part I think is that only this "choosen one" would be powerful enough to destroy the Sith. But perhaps Anakin's problems arise because of his power. Is it because of his tremendous power that he cannot control his emotions, that he feels Obi-Wan is stunting his growth.? And because of his power, Palpatine takes interest in him and uses his power to turn him to the dark side...but could Anakin have destroyed Palpatine outright?
Perhaps the question should be, are ANY jedi powerful enough to detect Palpatine's use of the dark side of the force? It seems that he is so powerful that not even Yoda can sense what he truly is, and certainly Anakin cannot. The only way to fight his "insidiousness" is with an insidious strategy, and unknowingly, Anakin does this by becoming Palpatine's apprentice. It is only by earning Palpatine's trust that Anakin is able to destroy him, and the ONLY way to earn his trust is to actually turn to the dark side. Thus, it is essential that Luke redeem his father, and it is essential that Anakin have offspring.
Don't be silly; you are being speculative, and I am merely saying so. Just because the film happened the way it did does not mean that was the only way it could happen; unless you can prove that from what was seen in the film it is purely speculation.
Unless it is specifally said that Palpatine could ONLY be defeated by Anakin turning to the dark side, that is PURE speculation. It also detracts from the drama of Anakin's fall; it's not even remotely tragic if it was actually necessary.