yeah thats all well and good, but i diddnt say a damn word about visual aids did i? Of course you can make a grand spectacular battle scene with make believe effects. It doesnt make it realistic. Bravehearts utter rawness of battle transformed it into an intense re creation of life in a set time.sure it had it's fair share of poetry and whatnot inbetween, but in fight sequences, you knew your heart was going to be ripped apart or driven to it's edge.
Yeah lord of the rings was beautifull. It was well thought out,carefully planned , meticulously shot and coordinated. However, lord of the rings was filmed as a peice of art, braveheart was filmed as peice of humanity and history. Lord of the rings more intense than braveheart...? No sir! We all knew what was going to happen in lord of the rings, whereas braveheart went on whim and an emotion, it rolled over into a war, an epic and then ended back on a wimb and an emotion.
lord of the rings doesnt have shit on bravhearts battle scenes...No sir!.
then again, these are two totally different genres here. whomever started this thread needs to be hit in the head with a spiked hammer for including lord of the rings in a poll rolled by historic period peices. i mean really, timmy are you 12 or somthin?