I agree with pr1983. and as for the tentacles talking to octavious, that is not dumb and campy. it gave more depth to the story. besides, he didn't start off evil in the comicbooks either. he went insane because of brain damage, and I personally think that it made more sense to make the tentacles take over instead, because it makes it more believable to do that, because i doubt brain damage would cause a man to become evil.
YOU'RE RIGHT DUDE! Tenacles talking to anybody must mean their mad and nothing else! Except if they meant subconsciously which still makes him plain stupid mad!
Sam R loves freaky stuff from doing evil dead and all those satanic crappy stuff from early in his old days. Hope the new film is better and hope walls dont start talking to people., that'd be freaky! Oh like goblins rocket motors which he uses to fly to start talking to Harry or Goblin himself.
I think that we are a little bit off topic but thats cool. I would just like to state that spiderman has had 2 great movies making him 2-0. Superman had 2 good movies making him 2-2 and batman had 1 good movie making him 1-3. Bats na d Supes both have new movies coming out soon? Can they turn it around? BTW both "new" movies are actually from earlier in the movie series. The Batman movie is a prequell to part 1 the only good batman movie and the Supes movie is suppose to be after part 2 but before part 3.
How can they make web shooters. They originaly did make them for the movie but stoped it because people wont believe wb from like toothpaste and candy could shoot out of that and spidey doesnt have to refill every second in the movie, but yet the y make the toy . The movie seemed more about spiderman trying to bone marry jane than an spidey story. The comic book and movie are to different. Superman is way better because the movie and comic was like the same .
As for batman they havnt got him right yet , I think he is harder to do because the costume is different and shadow, not to mesion his attitude. It would be cool if Kevin Conroy was batman while in the suit and some other guy was bruce wayne
[QUOTE]Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
[B]I think that we are a little bit off topic but thats cool. I would just like to state that spiderman has had 2 great movies making him 2-0. Superman had 2 good movies making him 2-2 and batman had 1 good movie making him 1-3.
okay I did not want to return to this thread but since someone felt the need to resurrect this dead old thread I got to correct you here.actually spiderman has had two crappy god awful movies making him 0-2 BATMAN has had NO good batman movies making him 0- 4,"that should change this year though with batman begins though." however you ARE correct that SUPERMAN has had two good movies making HIM 2-2.you at least got that part right. 😄
Originally posted by Max Spidey 24
How can they make web shooters. They originaly did make them for the movie but stoped it because people wont believe wb from like toothpaste and candy could shoot out of that and spidey doesnt have to refill every second in the movie, but yet the y make the toy . The movie seemed more about spiderman trying to bone marry jane than an spidey story. The comic book and movie are to different. Superman is way better because the movie and comic was like the same .As for batman they havnt got him right yet , I think he is harder to do because the costume is different and shadow, not to mesion his attitude. It would be cool if Kevin Conroy was batman while in the suit and some other guy was bruce wayne
so very well said,great post max.you are right that they did orif=ginally make them for the movie,but that was all just to try and shut up the fans and get them to be excited about the movie.huge mistake though because it just showed that Raimi and sony were liars saying they would be in the movie.
actually, that part was cool cus it didn't really matter as long as they came from his hand and made him swing! If we're on the same plain, how come spidey wasn't funny? No wise cracks? That was a discredit to Peter Parker cus that's what villains hated him for! Always making fun of them n their interlectual, so what give with that?
I just thought him losing his powers temporarily sucked cus what does that have to do with the omic. I support Mr Parker saying it was man spider! Maybe they should have turned him into a huge spider at the end like 'The Fly'!
Ok, i will end it because two main reasons. One is that is very, very boring discuss the same thing over and over again and second, this is a topic about another issue, so we are all off of topic. In my opinion, the web shooters should be included in the movies, the movies were extremely bad, more the first one than the second one, and were infaithfull to the spirit of the comics in many aspects. End of discussion for me.
Originally posted by dami wilson
actually, that part was cool cus it didn't really matter as long as they came from his hand and made him swing! If we're on the same plain, how come spidey wasn't funny? No wise cracks? That was a discredit to Peter Parker cus that's what villains hated him for! Always making fun of them n their interlectual, so what give with that?
Actually, i thought there were plenty of wise cracks.