Dr.Doom versus EVERYTHING!!!

Started by Havoc4704 pages

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
"just because he has knowledge of the character doesnt mean the character could win against EVERYTHING!!!!"

Where did I insinuate that because he has a vast knowledge of Doom, that it means Doom would win against everything? I didn't, unless you mean when I said that nothing he's said about Doom so far is false. In a serious debate about Doom, he hasn't said anything false. If he's joking it's probably gonna be a half to full lie or joke. You just made yourself look stupid, shame really. Coz I would have liked to do th.....oh wait, you gave me a chance to:

"indeed a true feat of dr.doom knowledge"

If I say in a thread about Silver Surfer "Surfer Wins" and nothing else. It doesn't mean I know nothing. Same with Vic, same with anyone. Meant in joke or not, him saying that doesn't mean he knows nothing. You clearly know nothing and are displaying it quite well however.


actually my first quote there meant to get back on the topic of dr. doom versus everything, so not only did you insult me but you also completely misinterpreted my post, which would make you a quick-to-act class-A moron

second quote was just a joke, so your quest to make me look stupid was just your ego going on a power-trip

"actually my first quote there meant to get back on the topic of dr. doom versus everything, so not only did you insult me but you also completely misinterpreted my post, which would make you a quick-to-act class-A moron"

YOU misinterpreted my post. I never insulted you, I said you just made yourself look stupid coz like.......you did. As for your excuse: "just because he has knowledge of the character doesnt mean the character could win against EVERYTHING!!!!". Seems pretty clear cut that you were making an assumption as to what I mean. What you mean and what you say should pair together, don't mean one thing and say another, leads to confusion.

"second quote was just a joke"

Why was it just a joke? Because I completely proved you wrong on it? Or was it genuinely a joke? If the latter is your answer, then again you should make it a bit more clearer rather than making a claim that is obviously going to be interpreted as serious because there was no reason for you to pick it out.

Clarity in posts, does alot. Anyway, I'm not gonna be the one to soil this thread, you were the one who posted irrelevantly to me. I cleared things up. Now, I have finished.

-AC

in case you didnt notice this topic was long dead, so thats why i put the post with everything in big letters and exclamation marks, just let it go, you said i made myself look stupid when i wasnt aiming for what you thought i was aiming at, so in other words you misinterpreted my post

and no it wasnt a joke because you "proved me wrong" it was a joke when i thought it up and when i typed it, didnt think someone other than vic would get offended by that, so thats it, you took my post wrong i cleared it up and thats the end of it

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Clarity in posts, does alot. Anyway, I'm not gonna be the one to soil this thread, you were the one who posted irrelevantly to me. I cleared things up. Now, I have finished.

wow...i posted irrrelevantly to YOU? i think you should take your own advice when speaking of clarity

"you said i made myself look stupid when i wasnt aiming for what you thought i was aiming at, so in other words you misinterpreted my post"

Who looks stupid more? The misinterpreter or the guy who leaves himself open to misinterpretation and then moans when misinterpreted? The latter, is the answer.

"it was a joke when i thought it up and when i typed it, didnt think someone other than vic would get offended by that, so thats it, you took my post wrong i cleared it up and thats the end of it"

You posted unclearly. Secondly, I wasn't offended. You addressed something, I addressed the same thing in reply. Simple.

"wow...i posted irrrelevantly to YOU? i think you should take your own advice when speaking of clarity"

Let it go he says.

Anyway, you posted something irrelevant, to me. There, prime example of clarity and all it took was two lines to clear it up. Not multiple posts.

-AC

I honestly think we should leave lobo out of this forum, hes unstoppable, same goes for the Hulk who is also so superly powerful he shouldnt be on this forum anymore.

Theres a few other characters that shouldnt be in VS matches on this forum, this includes Ghostrider because of his hellfire that can defeat anyone, The hulks immense power, and Lobo's inability to die OR be affected by any physical damage much less psychic attacks.

Oh, BTW, check this pic out.

One of the mask's oldest comics, and he was still screwing around.

Eh, Eh?

Stay on topic(excluding Dragon)

i have no doubts that doom would pawn lobo around like a cheap trick, or hulk for that matter. Ghost rider would be weird but doom's a mage sooooo...