Second Anti-Gay Commentator Paid Off By White House

Started by Adam_PoE2 pages

Second Anti-Gay Commentator Paid Off By White House

Article by Paul Johnson

Washington - Syndicated conservative columnist Maggie Gallagher who testified before the Senate in support of a constitutional ban on gay marriage was paid by the Bush Administration it was revealed on Wednesday.

The Washington Post reports that Gallagher received more than $40,000 from the White House and from the Department of Health and Human Services to help promote the president's program promoting heterosexual marriage as a means of strengthening families. She neglected to mention she was on the Administration's payroll when she testified in 2003 before the Senate subcommittee on the Constitution.

Just months before her appearance before the subcommittee she wrote in the National Review that "Polygamy is not worse than gay marriage, it is better."

Interviewed for a Wednesday column by the Post's Howard Kurtz, Gallagher said, "Did I violate journalistic ethics by not disclosing it? I don't know. You tell me." She also told Kurtz she would have "been happy to tell anyone who called me" about the contract but that "frankly, it never occurred to me" to disclose it.

After Kurtz told her Tuesday that he was working on a story about the payoff, Gallagher filed a column in which she said that "I should have disclosed a government contract when I later wrote about the Bush marriage initiative. I would have, if I had remembered it. My apologies to my readers."

Earlier this month is was disclosed that another prominent conservative columnist was also paid by the Bush Administration to promote the President's agenda in his columns.

Armstrong Williams who regularly attacks gays was paid nearly a quarter million dollars to promote the No Child Left Behind law according to documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by USA Today.

Tribune Media Services dropped Williams's column after his administration contract was disclosed. Universal Press Syndicate, which distributes Gallagher's column, said it plans no such action.

The nation's largest LGBT civil rights organization Wednesday called on the Acting Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services to investigate whether Gallagher violated federal law by not disclosing the funding to the public or Congress.

"The public deserves to know if there are other 'pay-to-sway' columnists and opinion leaders on the Bush Administration payroll," said HRC Political Director Winnie Stachelberg.

In the letter, Stachelberg wrote, "The failure to disclose a financial conflict-of-interest seems to us to be a clear violation of the public's trust in journalist integrity. We would like to know whether federal law or congressional rules were violated when Gallagher testified before Congress, testimony that to our knowledge was not preceded by disclosures of these financial contracts and interests. ... In an era of pinched funding, where critical health care and social service programs are experiencing severe budget cuts, we find the use of government funds for political advocacy to be deeply troubling."

National Stonewall Democrats also criticized Gallagher.

"Maggie Gallagher is perhaps the best know advocate for marriage discrimination against gay families," said Dave Noble, NSD Executive Director. "The White House should not be shadow funding her activities while Republicans call on her to testify before Congress as an independent voice on such matters."

During a scheduled news conference Wednesday the President was asked about paying journalists for promoting Administration policy.

"It's wrong," Bush said, adding he has instructed his cabinet not to allow it to occur again.

"We value our reputation with the press, Bush said, "And the press must remain independent."

Gusse what? No one gives a crap about gay rights

When did the word "General" in the name of this forum get replaced by "Gay?"

It seem that the gdf has turned to gay disscussion forum

Originally posted by botankus
When did the word "General" in the name of this forum get replaced by "Gay?"

So true.

yeah, who cares about taxpayer funded secret propaganda.
it worked for hitler right?

Originally posted by Napalm
Gusse what? No one gives a crap about gay rights

thank you for being the self proclaimed spokesman of everyone. thank god we dont have to bother with formulating our own opinions.

of everyone? I'm being ignored again huh

I find it amazing that people looked right past the fact the Bush is manipulating the press for his own agenda with taxpayer money and headed straight at the gay issue.

Gusse what? No one gives a crap about gay rights
guess what no one gives a crap about your opinion

And when did the "General" become the "Homophobes Hangout" Discussion Thread?

Are you all so blatantly homophobic and prejudiced that just seeing the word "gay" infuriates you?

Absolutely disgusting.

....

It does not surprise me one bit the disgusting low levels the Bush Administration will stoop to in order to spread their vile, prejudiced homophobic beliefs.

They dont care that they're breaking laws. After all they invaded a country illegally.

Originally posted by Tex
And when did the "General" become the "Homophobes Hangout" Discussion Thread?

Are you all so blatantly homophobic and prejudiced that just seeing the word "gay" infuriates you?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
I find it amazing that people looked right past the fact the Bush is manipulating the press for his own agenda with taxpayer money and headed straight at the gay issue.

I noticed it, but what are we going to do? It's politics, and it's an everyday thing, especially in this administration. Don't act so surprised.

"Homophobic" gets thrown around waaaaay too often here, and most everywhere else. Since the term is rooted in "the fear of", which isn't true, it is notable that 5 of the 30 active topics in the GDF are dealing with homosexuality.

That's just an observation, which I acknowledged, and hopefully that doesn't make me guilty by association.

Originally posted by Tex
And when did the "General" become the "Homophobes Hangout" Discussion Thread?

Are you all so blatantly homophobic and prejudiced that just seeing the word "gay" infuriates you?

Absolutely disgusting.

And would you please tell me how commenting about how 4 of the most recent 8 threads deal with gay issues in a General Discussion forum that's open to any topic in the world makes you a "disgusting homophobe?"

Please do tell, but careful! Don't be too close-minded and stereotypical. I know how much you hate those people!

SO that means its a major issue.... and It is.....
This is not so much as a gay-rights issue but as a democratic issue,
Should people be payed to alter or jsut say their opinions?
I say no, its wrong and influences people falsly

i have an idea

DONT READ THE THREAD 😱

especially since it has "gay" in the title, its quite easy to avoid.
since there are so many happenings surrounding this issue, its
natural that there would be many threads on it, just as many threads pop
up based on the current u.s. president, or the war in iraq...etc.
deal with it. not everything can be neatly packed into one topic,
especially when this also deals with illegal propaganda.

PVS; to further help this people, I think you should point them to the "ignore thread" function 👆

not my job 😛

Originally posted by PVS
i have an idea

DONT READ THE THREAD 😱

especially since it has "gay" in the title, its quite easy to avoid.
since there are so many happenings surrounding this issue, its
natural that there would be many threads on it, just as many threads pop
up based on the current u.s. president, or the war in iraq...etc.
deal with it. not everything can be neatly packed into one topic,
especially when this also deals with illegal propaganda.

Chris and I aren't homophobic, firstly, as far as I know. We shouldn't have to avoid threads after making a general comment about the forums activity as of late.

It's nothing more than an observation. Napalm can get his comeuppance, but we're innocent observers.

If you take issue to a certain poster or thread, use the ignore feature, or report the thread, and it'll be handled accordingly.

there will, for as long as you frequent internetforums, be threads you don't like. NO ONE will change his/her views or stop posting threads that interest him/her, so either start working on ignoring threads or simply don't log onto a forum anymore

EDIT:

(my post can be misinterpreted, so I'll expand on it)

I just mean that no matter what, there will always be someone or more than one, that will post a topic that has to do with homosexuality, so instead of disliking that you have to ignore these threads, you just have to accept this, move on and just if it bothers you so much use the ignore function

i wouldnt think of calling you homophobic.
im just pointing out that the issue of homosexuality spreads far into
politics and world events. there are far more issues relating to it than "do you think its ok/bad to be gay?". this topic is a perfect example imho.

with all the craziness thats been going on with this issue, its no surprise to me that there would be many threads on things related to it.

now, if this DOES become another "do you think its ok/bad to be gay" thread...which it very well might, THEN it has become redundant and useless.