Pack up the truck, we're going to Iran!!

God, this thread is sooo on-topic. (Note the sarcasm)

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Actually, I called no one a redneck.

PVS did

To get back on topic; I doubt Bush is gonna go after Iran, certainly not before he has a chance to get the bulk of his troops out of Iraq.

Also a fight with Iran would be a lot more bloody then a fight with Iraq.

Originally posted by finti
well Napalm, you sure dont have a degree in German

oh please dont discourage him. cant you see he's trying to intimidate me with his superior intellect? i find it rather cute 😂

EDIT>>> k sorry...back to topic then

so.................Iran

Also a fight with Iran would be a lot more bloody then a fight with Iraq

I don't belive Amwerica has the resources for another war, and if they actually do I think Iran is the wrong target.

Originally posted by finti
well the Iraqi conflict is pretty bloody though

For the Iraqis it sure is.

Dont listin to PVS hes the ignorent one here

I actually think that Bush is going to go for Iran. And there will ALWAYS be american troops in Iraq if they finally win.

Americans defeated the Germans and are still there.

Americans defeated the Japanese and are still there.

Americans went to Korea and are still there.

See the pattern?

Originally posted by Napalm
Excuse me I am more educated than youll ever be

Uuuum, this coming from a person who told me that he'd rather torture a human than a kitten because there are more humans in the world?

I doubt your logic more than your education, although both are arguable.

For the Iraqis it sure is.

You have been whatching the news right? There are alot of dead and wounded american servicemen as a result of this conflict.

Hasn't the US lost about 1,400 troops already? and probably about 10 times that number in severly wounded men?

I'd call that quite bloody as well. And this is only from guerilla warfare. The iraqi army never even put up a decent fight, now Irans militairy is in a wee bit better shape then Iraqs so I think it would cause a lot more problems.

war on Iran I doubt it, it will be though to fight a two front war, plus I don't think Dubya will gain support at capitol hill for another conflict in the middle east

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Uuuum, this coming from a person who told me that he'd rather torture a human than a kitten because there are more humans in the world?

I doubt your logic more than your education, although both are arguable.

I never said anything about a kitten 😕

idd Finti, not to talk about the serious amount of money it would cost

Originally posted by Napalm
Dont listin to PVS hes the ignorent one here

yeah seriously, if you go for a third degree, major in english...please.

Originally posted by Napalm
I never said anything about a kitten 😕

Originally posted by SlipknoT
Im just saying I could Torture a human with less guit than if I tortured a kitten. Not that i would do either.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=3090878#post3090878

Good arguement PVS 🙄

Originally posted by PVS
yeah seriously, if you go for a third degree, major in english...please.

Você lembra-me de um macaco retardado