Originally posted by Dave123
no..... Vice City is NOT number 4it is based on the same game engine, they just added bikes, guns, did some minor modifications and called it Vice City
therefore it is GTA 3.1 ✅
Actually...GTA VC was a Prequel to GTA 1, yet there is also GTA London 1969, which is even more of a prequel, but made years before.
So we have...:
GTA: London 1969
GTA: Vice City
GTA
GTA 2
GTA 3
GTA: San Andreas
well that is kind of a time line of sorts for the GTA series and it looks ok, GTA 4 will not i repeat will not be on the playstation 2 or xbox or gamecube as none of these consoles can do what rockstar want them to do for GTA 4, this was said as i`ve said before by the magazine Games Master (uk mag).
Anyway, it`s stupid argueing over this as we should just be happy with GTA 3, VC, GTA SA, then when the station 3 arrives then and only then will we get GTA 4, i will be buyng GTA SA and GTA 4, i l.o.v.e gta3 and gtavc but i cant stand the other ones with cr*ppy top down view, i didn`t look at gta untill gta3 came out.
GTA 3 to me is the best one so far, what i hate is those who prefer VC because it has bikes and choppers, that doesn`t make it better as GTA 3 the whole city was better designed than vice city was and is, it wasn`t as big as vice city no but it`s quality over quantity with GTA 3.
Originally posted by Lan©eWinduwho mentioned an in-game time line? 😕
Actually...GTA VC was a Prequel to GTA 1, yet there is also GTA London 1969, which is even more of a prequel, but made years before.So we have...:
GTA: London 1969
GTA: Vice City
GTA
GTA 2
GTA 3
GTA: San Andreas
i just mean GTA 3 was practically Vice