no to stephen speilburg

speilburg can't do the chanka movie...cause he is from the tribe of judah not israel which means he violates the islamic sabbath and not the jewish one...!!!

speilburg movies are boring one always knows what is going to happen...the movies are too fake the scences in his movies are whatever it is....stupid

mel's protray of mary and the women's role was done with honor, dignity, and respect...unlike speilburg who would have had mary cry when she didn't...

speilburg can't understand that cause he is a socialist and an idiot...and those type of women have no respect... so how would they know what it is like to suffer what both marys' did??? the answer...speilburg doesn't!!!

any questions???

🤨

same here Ash this should be moved to say the least 😛

Speilburg ?? 🤨 U mean Spielberg ? And he's a guy AFAIK.....
AND HE DOESN'T DO CRAP MOVIES!! 😠

E.T. rules!

😂 ✅

Originally posted by ravin
speilburg can't do the chanka movie...cause he is from the tribe of judah not israel which means he violates the islamic sabbath and not the jewish one...!!!
mel's protray of mary and the women's role was done with honor, dignity, and respect...unlike speilburg who would have had mary cry when she didn't...
speilburg can't understand that cause he is a socialist and an idiot...and those type of women have no respect... so how would they know what it is like to suffer what both marys' did??? the answer...speilburg doesn't!!!

any questions???

The first part of you post seems very religious! The last part of your post seems very political! Be cautious with those two here!

What does Mel Gibson portray of Mary Magdalene has to do with Spielberg???

is one of thoese Islamic extrimist types or soemthing

She needs to be careful with religous and political threads here.

Personally I didn't get that first post 😕
And E.T. scares me 😮

Like it was said beofre, no religious or political talk here.
And please explain yourself because none of us understood your post.
Moving to movie discussion.
Moving--moved.

If you search all 10 of ravin's posts, you'll find at least 8 of them about religion or politics

SO what if Speilberg wouldn't have done Passions of christ. The man is has a duty to make movies that he beleives in and to portray things he is interested in. Gibson is christian and he would have found some sort of joy/or something in making a story about the man they believe as " their" god ( mind you jesus is the SON of god but MANY people tend to treat him as god or even more important)

Think about it, WOUld GIbson have made a good ( or great as people keep saying about this movie) about another Religious head( such as Allah, Buddha, Shiva, or QUETZALCOATL). I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT.

Speilberg is one of the greatest creative minds of our time, so dont diss him .

And sorry to say it , BUT gibson is keeping up with hollywood/movies today theme of making something that has been made BEFORE. NEED more originality. Its just that people are soooooooooo used to Gore movies these day that a graphic Bible story fits in perfectly.