Fine, clickclick, dizzyblondegirl and debiejo, all you narrow minded creationists...keep believing the limited and narrow definitions of words in dictionaries of which the meaning was not at all clear to who ever compiled it. ASK A DICTIONARY FOR THE PLAIN DEFINITION OF A WORD, BUT ASK THE PHILOSOPHER FOR THE REAL MEANING OF A WORD.
For one, your petty insults dont change the situation one bit. You think that somebody being a creationist makes them "narrowminded". How pathetic a suggestion. Added to which, the your reference you made to people being creationist is laughable given the current subject (the meaning of a word).
Please try to act like a mature adult instead of using your childish diverting tactics by stating irrelevancies.
You claimed that the meaning of a word is subjective, so why did you act as if yours interpretation was the authority?
You complain about how "limited" the definitions for a words in dictionaries are. However, that is not a legitimate objection. They need to be limited, otherwise language would be hindered greatly.
Clearly, you were out of line in your objection, aswell as in the way you objected.
Not only does the dictionary refute your objection but YOU refute your initial objection.
Calling yourself a philosopher isnt going to get people to respect you either.
Good luck and peace.