Why did the matrix 2, and 3 suck so bad?

Where did they go wrong?
The first was good the 2nd, and 3rd were horrible...

i know, i really liked the first and the second was ok, but i hated the third one...i didn't like neo dying... ❌

They were all bad. Can you prove that eo died thouigh?

I thought he died when Smith killed him and the machines dragged his corpse away.

They said in the first Matrix commentary that they really hate that movie because they'd never be able to work up to it. And it's true. The first was so good and sequels (which can't be as good) are destined to be compared with the original.

Originally posted by Bardock42
They were all bad.

you have horrible taste in movies

Originally posted by Stinky_Bottoms
Where did they go wrong?

well i liked them and it kinda hinted something at the end of 3 but i guess i understand to a good extent about and my fav-fav was part 1

number 2 was good.. 3 sucked.

I think they sucked so much because they were drastically different in style and story. I guess it's kind of the same reason so many people have problems with the Star Wars prequels, the style, the story and the writting just completely tangents from the original trilogy and the same is true of the first matrix and the second and third.

i thin neither sucked, i just think that the first was better then the 2nd, and the 2nd was better then the 3rd

^ ya well said

Originally posted by cal31
By making it too complex for people like you to understand it.

Too Complex?
Simple minded twit.. Tommy Boy was more complex then that horse dung put on film Matrix 2, and 3...
Such a fool you are for even trying to say that it was too complex..
I swear you children online now a days... 😎 You worry me....

I really liked 2 and 3, I thought they were a great extension to the original. My favourite characters were probably the Twins, I thought they were brilliant, and I liked the Merovingian as well. I liked how they expanded on all the Matrix philosophy as well....

but I spose its all a matter of opinion - some peopl liked it, some hated it ((like marmite! 😄 ))

*sigh* this type thread has been done to death!

they so didn't suck they added to the story, I think you would have been complaining anyways if there werent any sequals

[edit]

Keep this on topic!

first had best story.
second had best action scenes.
third all around sucked.

Originally posted by Stinky_Bottoms
Too Complex?
Simple minded twit.. Tommy Boy was more complex then that horse dung put on film Matrix 2, and 3...
Such a fool you are for even trying to say that it was too complex..
I swear you children online now a days... 😎 You worry me....

Originally posted by Velcro_Boy
first had best story.
second had best action scenes.
third all around sucked.

sry, im gonna have to disagree, but when you say the 2nd had the best action scenes. the 2nd had better graphics, but when it came to the burly brawl, and some other action sequences in that movie, it was just too fake looking to me. i really liked the highway scene though, i will admit. but the first movie's action sequencses were better in my opinion because it looked so real, mainly because it was almost all real, but with strings attached and stuff. i say first had best story AND action sequences, 2nd had better graphics (and the highway scene kicked ass) and the 3rd just wasn't as good as the first 2

The second and third films were bad for two reasons:

[list=1][*]The first film was philosophical whereas the latter two films were theological.

[*]The division between the latter two films seems arbitrary.[/list]