World War I = WTF.

Started by FeceMan2 pages

World War I = WTF.

This war was completely retarded. Horrible tactics and strategy, inept military commanders, trench warfare...sheesh. I cannot even decide who the 'bad guys' were. The only positive things that came out of it were gas masks, plastic surgery, and tanks.

Actually, now that I think of it, the British were pretty much assholes at the end of it. And Haig...wasn't good.

What are your thoughts on WWI?

Haig was not the right man for the job. A cavalry man in a trench warfare situation? Not smart. And yes, it was a horrific disaster in terms of tactics.

Re: World War I = WTF.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Actually, now that I think of it, the British were pretty much assholes at the end of it. And Haig...wasn't good.

u son of a........

thats why it is called the uneccesary war..or the great war..or both

Commonly Believed Cause of WW1

Strong feelings of nationalism throughout Europe prior to The Great War created an atmosphere in Europe which made war a likelihood. The spark which ignited the flame and transformed these underlying problems into a frenzy of hostilities happened on June 28, 1914, when Archduke Francis Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated by a Serbian student, Gavrilo Princip, while visiting Serbia.

The Real Cause of WW1

According to Albert Pike, the First World War was designed to enable the Czarist Government in Russia to be finally and completely overthrown and replaced with a new atheist, Communist government.

History records that this First World War did indeed occur as predicted. The Western powers in Europe, in conjunction with the United States, financed Lenin's expedition into Russia, and financed his government consistently. The US has financed Russian Communism at least once per decade since then.

A little closer to home:

In 1909, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace was tasked to answer the following question posed by the US government: "If it is desirable to alter the lives of an entire nation, is there any means more efficient than war?" After a year of research, the answer came back: "There are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire nation."

And for what reason would anyone want to alter the lives of an entire nation?

Historian Walter Mills wrote the following about the purpose of the war and about Colonel House's basic intent: "The Colonel's sole justification for preparing such a batch of blood for his countrymen was his hope of establishing a new world order, [a world government] of peace and security...."

Actually, I like pre-Passchendaele Haig.

Casualties in WW1
Germany 1,800,000
Soviet Union 1,700,000
France 1,385,000
Austria 1,200,000
Great Britain 947,000
Japan 800,000
Romania 750,000
Serbia 708,000
Italy 460,000
Turkey 325,000
Belgium 267,000
Greece 230,000
USA 137,000
Portugal 100,000
Canada 69,000
Bulgaria 88,000
Montenegro 50,000
TOTAL 11,016,000

Why are you posting that?

This war was completely retarded
all wars are retarded

The only positive things that came out of it were gas masks, plastic surgery, and tanks.
tanks? a destructive weapon is a positive thing

According to Albert Pike, the First World War was designed to enable the Czarist Government in Russia to be finally and completely overthrown and replaced with a new atheist, Communist government.
Albert Pike needs to read history a bit closer

albert pike predicted the wars before they started
One message that Albert Pike received from his spirit guide, and which in reality we know to be a demonic vision, he described in a letter that he wrote to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that have already taken place. This is not because the devil has powers of prophecy, but because his agents have undertaken to manipulate political events to closely follow his designs.

albert pike predicted the wars before they started
his prediction of why WW I started was wrong

to bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that have already taken place.
if you study the build up of society and its always moving boundaries it aint all that hard to predict future wars or events. Key elements here Nasionalism and religion

WW1 started because they were two big familes. ONe failmy(austria) attacked a small member of the other family(Serbia).So then the elder (russia) got invlovecd. THen germany, then france then Britain and its whole empire. Then after years of bloodshed the Americans came in late.

all wars are retarded

tanks? a destructive weapon is a positive thing


No, not all wars are retarded. And yes, technological advances are a good thing; tanks were one of the things that eliminated trench warfare (thank goodness).

This thread is not yet prepared to die.

People- especially people who have only studied this at school- often talk loosely about 'horrible tactics' but unless you are spending your entire career studying Gallipoli, the truth is far more complex. Some of the finest tactics in the history of warfare were employed by both sides.

Re: World War I = WTF.

Originally posted by FeceMan

What are your thoughts on WWI?

It was going to happen anyway. There were too many ethnic differences and too many disputed territories. Add to that the hostility between nations and some broken treaties and you get WWI.

And what's interesting about this is that after the war was over and everyone was signing papers in Versailles. Another war could have been avoided earlier. The Vietnam war would have never happen or would have been very different if only diplomats could had listen to Ho Chi Minh when he petition equals rights in Indochina. But of course the man was Asian and in room full of arrogant aristocrats no one paid attention.

Ush made a good point.

Dean about ppl predicting anything I call it pure luck

Originally posted by dean7879
Casualties in WW1
Germany 1,800,000
Soviet Union 1,700,000
France 1,385,000
Austria 1,200,000
Great Britain 947,000
Japan 800,000
Romania 750,000
Serbia 708,000
Italy 460,000
Turkey 325,000
Belgium 267,000
Greece 230,000
USA 137,000
Portugal 100,000
Canada 69,000
Bulgaria 88,000
Montenegro 50,000
TOTAL 11,016,000

schmoll

and as always my poor country has been ignored.

Poland was not an independant nation during wwI

Originally posted by Clovie
schmoll

and as always my poor country has been ignored.

You think you're the only one? Where's India. We helped Britian in WWI, and WWII. And yet, we get no/little recognition.

Cockal Doodle F*cking Do Britain, thanks for nothing.