Originally posted by 2damnloud
Yes, it was pretty much the wrong usuage.😬
No its not. To try and sperate a single concept into two is "sham distinction." Saying otherwise doesn't mean that its not.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
His shielding is EM in nature, her psionics work and thrive in EM.
Riight... pull the other one.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
His shielding is inconsequential for the very means in which he uses as defense doesn't matter to her since all psionics are not the same.
All psionic energy is the same, its the application of that energy which differs.
Unless you've got some evidence to back your claims of it being different?
Which we know you don't have because you insisted on argumentum ad ignorantiam... Thank you for that by the way... the proving you don't have the evidence to back your claims. You do far more damage to your arguments then you realize.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
You have yet to even prove that all psionic energy is the same.😂
you're the one who initially made the claim that it is different. Burden of proof is on your shoulders.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Sweeping generalization.
Sham distinction.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Basically, his means of protecting himself is irrelevant.🙂
supressed evidence fallacy.
So you have nothing to argue with other than a sham distinction of psionic energy being different from psionic energy... a sweeping generilization of all technology being the same... a strong lack of evidence... and a whole heaping load of fanboyism.
And yet you accuse those who don't agree with you for lacking "critical thinking"?
Do you even know what that means? Cause I severely doubt that you do.