Originally posted by Molecule man
That was the old Molecule man before he could even affect organic molecules. But as time went by he have become much more powerful as you mentioned earlier...(vs Kosmos). Galactus won't be much trouble for Owen if he's really pissed off
And Kubik also mentioned to Kosmos that beings such as Galactus, Celestials, Chronos, the Vishanti, etc. are above cube beings in power.
Originally posted by Molecule man
Well Owen isn't just a ordinary cosmic cube since he has a human mind that makes him so much more Kubik said.
Yup. But he's still below Galactus and others. Galactus creates heralds that are are Thor's level, sometimes a notch below. Tyrant, even though not his original self, is still around skyfather level or above.
Furthermore, if MM was that powerful, Doom would've tried to take MM's power no matter MM's experience with his power.
The Molecule Man of that piece-of-s*** Secret Wars II was
all powerful, just as the Beyonder of that same series.
But that series has been negated by Secret Wars III, which showed
Beyonder to be nothing but a cosmic cube, and that all the
amazing manifestations of powers he showed in Secret Wars II was
a giant hoax that barely exntended beyond earth itself.
Now Molecule Man isn't as strong as that Beyonder (Beyonder was
a cosmic cube, while MM is, I believe, a human who was exposed
to the powers of a cosmic cube, gaining some of its powers), so his
powers would be even less.
Botton line: just as Silver Surfer can control Cosmic powers, but
not to the level of a Galactus, the same can be said of MM's
control over molecules.
It's a question of the extent of powers, not the nature of them.
Originally posted by King Burger
The Molecule Man of that piece-of-s*** Secret Wars II was
all powerful, just as the Beyonder of that same series.But that series has been negated by Secret Wars III, which showed
Beyonder to be nothing but a cosmic cube, and that all the
amazing manifestations of powers he showed in Secret Wars II was
a giant hoax that barely exntended beyond earth itself.Now Molecule Man isn't as strong as that Beyonder (Beyonder was
a cosmic cube, while MM is, I believe, a human who was exposed
to the powers of a cosmic cube, gaining some of its powers), so his
powers would be even less.Botton line: just as Silver Surfer can control Cosmic powers, but
not to the level of a Galactus, the same can be said of MM's
control over molecules.It's a question of the extent of powers, not the nature of them.
Molecule Man is above other cube beings. You'd think he'd by weaker but he's not. Kubik mentioned this to Molecule Man as he pleaded to MM to stop his relentless attack on Beyonder/Kosmos. Not that Beyonder wasn't able to put up a fight, Molecule Man was just getting the better of Beyonder.
Him being a human allowed him to operate on another level that cube beings born from cosmic cubes are not able to.
Originally posted by Molecule man
You guys are overrating Galactus if he is really that powerful he wouldn't have to consume planets just to survive.Molecule man could create herald-beings too if he wanted to
He's not. That's his role in the universe. Ever heard the statement that Galactus was a force of nature? He is. He's the balance between Eternity and Death. Just cause he eats planets doesn't mean he's weak.
Skyfathers and Elder Gods don't eat much either and they're cosmic level beings. Neither does Tyrant. But that still doesn't mean they're more powerful that Galactus.
Dark Phoenix consumes stars, are you saying she's weaker than Molecule Man or other cube beings?
Originally posted by psycho gundam
http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/9468/reality5hd.jpg
Originally posted by LordFear
It's not an interesting theory it's a fact u have molecules, atoms and subatomic molecules such as quartz and such. It is a scentific fact. Just because time and reality is an abstract thought you seem to think that it's not made up of anything. Have u ever read some of Einstein's work????Obviously not cuz u seem to know more than him don't u Professor!!!
LULZ. Have YOU read any of Einsteins work? NO. Have you ever heard the phrase, "The vaccum of space."? That means that space is made up of vast amounts of.... nothing. At least nothing that science has identified yet. I also think you mean sub atomic particles, such as quarks, not quartz, which is a type of crystal. The vast majority of the universe is absolutely nothing... aka space.
So next time you should actually know what you are talking about, rather than pretending you do.
Originally posted by LordFear
linkalicious then u tell those scholars who studied quantum physics what it's made of tell them since u disagree. The beauty with an opinion is to have supporting fact to back it up. I am calling you out and asking you what is time made of? If u say u don't know then u can't debate the argument.
LULZ. Now you are bringing in an ENTIRELY theoretical field of science as PROOF for your side. You show me the "time" element on the periodic table, or the combination of elements that makes up a "time" molecule... Oh you can't. Just stop while you are ahead.
