Originally posted by finti
dont know why artists should be considered intelligent
exceptional artistic ability is definitely a sign of inteligence, finti. It takes considerable intelligence to produce a great work of art - there are many facets one has to master in order to produce a great art piece - composition, light effects, pose, creativity, originality, proportion, etc. That's why they talk of artistic genius.
Originally posted by finti
its a skill, dont have to be intelligent to produce art. They produce what they see, as for light composition that is something they learn, protportion aint all that either a lot of tricks there
You are right - you don't have to be intelligent to produce art, BUT you HAVE to be intelligent to produce great art. Why do you think there are good and bad artists? Moreover, an exceptional skill requires intelligence. Have you ever seen agreat artists with the IQ of a retard?
Why do you think there are good and bad artists?cause some artist sucks at what they do, they dont have the necessary skill to produce art, as for great art thats a matter of opinion. Some might find a piece of art great while another think it sucks again doesnt have to do with intelligence it has to do with skill.
Have you ever seen agreat artists with the IQ of a retard?I wasnt talking about retards, I was tallking about that artist doesnt nesseceraly need to be highly intelligent to produce art, big diffrence there
People are smart in different ways. Just because you're not a rocket scientist or in an equivlant profession doesn't make you dumb. For example, a rocket scientist may know the chemical formula of rocket fuel, but I'm pretty sure this same scientist wouldn't know how to farm. There are so many different kinds of smart. Not everyone can be smart in everything.