BANE VS Gambit

Started by socool85202 pages

Yeah, I had heard that Gambit could do that now. I feel that kinda cheapened him as a character, kinda the way the healing factor makes people think Wolverine is a cheap character. Can Gambit charge people as fast as non organic objects?

I really don't see how bane has a chance.......

Bump

Gambit

gambit wins, hes more than enough of a physical fighter to be able to take bane at close range if it comes to that.

WTF.

Gambit stomps him. 😬

Gambit 10/10

Batman was physically exhausted when Bane broke his back. The times they've fought since then have been very different. Gambit wins easily. His speed, agility, and power set are too much for a brick like Bane. To win Bane either needs to connect with a powerful punch or grab a hold of him to do any damage. Gambit just needs one card and it doesn't even need to hit Bane, just in his general area. Gambit wouldn't be stupid enough to stand close enough for Bane to do any real damage. Bane would be reduced to picking up objects and throwing them at Gambit, hoping to get lucky.

or gambit just throws a card at him

Gambit is a solid bullet-timer no?

Originally posted by Lord_Talron
gambit wins, hes more than enough of a physical fighter to be able to take bane at close range if it comes to that.

I think Bane has taken on more physical foes than Gambit, but with his power, Gambit wins.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
WTF.

Gambit stomps him. 😬