Originally posted by Obiwalker08
6
How can Episode III get 6 when its out of 5 stars, besides it will get 3 or 4 because, I don't want to sound like a Star Wars hater but although Episdoe III will have amazing action, speical effects and everything, but that doesn't mean it will be terrific because it's the storyline reviewers and critics are looking for, and the plot is very good, but George Lucas isn't a very good director anymore.
Originally posted by RottenDarthOne
I'll go and say Leonard Maltin (that idiot) will give Episode III, three stars out of four.He gave Episode I three stars, and Episode II two stars.
No I think that's the other way round because Episode II is probably better than Episode I, and I think they both got 3, or Episode I got 2 and Episode II got 2 or 3.
Its sad to say but i reckon KING KONG will nab the SFX oscar next year much like THE MATRIX did over TPM...its just the way things go with SW nowadays....OSCAR dont take LUCAS seriously anymore.
I even think that KONG will outgross SITH
Im hoping for a 4 star rating but i reckon ill like certain parts more than the whole movie much like the other 2 prequels.
****
Originally posted by awain
How can Episode III get 6 when its out of 5 stars, besides it will get 3 or 4 because, I don't want to sound like a Star Wars hater but although Episdoe III will have amazing action, speical effects and everything, but that doesn't mean it will be terrific because it's the storyline reviewers and critics are looking for, and the plot is very good, but George Lucas isn't a very good director anymore.
Anymore? He wasn't a good director in the first place. The best SW movies have been the ones he didn't direct. He's a visionary to be credited with creating this wonderful universe that we all love, but he never was a very good filmmaker.
Awain, on a completely unrelated note, you really need to pay more attention in english class. Your posts have been consistently atrocious as far as grammar, spelling, and sentence structure goes. I'm not trying to be rude, but a little proofreading goes a long way. Its really hard and frustrating to try to read posts that look like they were made by ten-year-olds.
Originally posted by Creechuur
Anymore? He wasn't a good director in the first place. The best SW movies have been the ones he didn't direct. He's a visionary to be credited with creating this wonderful universe that we all love, but he never was a very good filmmaker.Awain, on a completely unrelated note, you really need to pay more attention in english class. Your posts have been consistently atrocious as far as grammar, spelling, and sentence structure goes. I'm not trying to be rude, but a little proofreading goes a long way. Its really hard and frustrating to try to read posts that look like they were made by ten-year-olds.
Cmon Creechur this is a SW forum and a mentalist one at that.
Most of us cant be arsed with sentance structure and grammar
AND besides most of these posts ARE made by ten year olds!
Originally posted by cylob49
Its sad to say but i reckon KING KONG will nab the SFX oscar next year much like THE MATRIX did over TPM...its just the way things go with SW nowadays....OSCAR dont take LUCAS seriously anymore.
I even think that KONG will outgross SITH
Im hoping for a 4 star rating but i reckon ill like certain parts more than the whole movie much like the other 2 prequels.
****
i can see why The Matrix won over TPM...Matrix was something people never saw before..fighting styles and bullet time and stuff like that...but with the technology ROTS has i think it will be right up there...im not a fan of King Kong..i dont really see the thrill in the movie...but i think the special effects will be good but not as good as ROTS..