Re: New Signature Limits
Originally posted by Raz
Signature limits are being reduced, as I think the currents limits are too excessive.The signature images now have a limit of 450x150 and the text now has a limit of 8 lines.
Custom smilies (due to recent abuse) will no longer be allowed in signatures.
Quote tags, due to the space it takes, will no longer be allowed.
The change will not affect you unless you change your profile.
It's sexy when Raz puts his foot down like that.
As I see it there are only 2 opnions on the sig change, indifference and objection, so, the only reason I think its being implimented is because of a personal preference of Raz's. Now of course it is HIS website but it is a VERY large forum with many people who like it and dont want to leave and if they dont want the change and dont mind the current settings I really dont think changing the limit is justified.
Originally posted by Korri
I still dont see why everyone is complaining, it just means there is more room for other things and should speed things up a little. Plus i hate signatures that are too big they just annoy me, the new restrictions are not that bad at all guys.Quit moping and get over it.
maybe some ppl simply like big sigs, they like to make them big and now they can't, they have the right to express they're opinion
as for me Im ok with being 150 vertical, but I dont like it being 450 horizontal 🙁
Originally posted by Korri
I still dont see why everyone is complaining, it just means there is more room for other things and should speed things up a little. Plus i hate signatures that are too big they just annoy me, the new restrictions are not that bad at all guys.Quit moping and get over it.
ah ok since its ok with korri its ok with everyone, of course why didnt I realize that before, ok go ahead Raz reduce it to 100x200 Korri doesnt like big sigs.
Originally posted by RazAfter thinking about this a little more, I think its wise to have them smaller if people are absuing the privilege.
OK after all this "talk", I have not seen one good argument for keeping larger signatures...
I like the smaller and thiner signatures anyway - i cant really think of why we would need bigger, but why not keep the lenght 500 and only regulate the hight?
cry my saber is 500 long, and if i change my siggy (which probably wont happen for a while) i cant have my saber the same lenght again cry And sabers that are less than 500 pix just look poo!!! cry
^^ did that sound selish? Thats the only argument i have to keep the lenght the same, and reduce the hight droolio
Raz:
if people want to put some content into a sig, but they dont have enough room to put it all in, they will just change to have no sigs. the forum will go and people will be bored. the signiture is like an id. i see your sig and say: "hey, raz likes star wars" and people will say the same about me. but if i loose interest in star wars (AS IF) or if people loose interest in what there sigs are expressing, or if they want to change to a different element of what they like, they will want to change it. but they cant if the limits are too small. and we wont know users personalities and what they like and it would just be lifeless.