smittenkitten
I give you everything.
"Correction of your correction: No it didn't. Counter that if you can....(you can't)."
That wasn't even a quality counter, honeybun. But let me try to 'counter' that..Correction: You are mistaken. It did.
But whoever said that it wasn't a 'pisspoor effort' was right; I was exaggerating. Especially considering music today, it was good...just not as good as it could've been, which is what should be expected of Maynard.
Further, though I am not a 'pro' musician, I've been extensively trained in music theory and have played two instruments for over a decade. If anyone understands music on this board, it's me.
"The fact that I believe it is a better album is enough for me sweetcheeks."
Oh lordy, that's not a good reason. Your beliefs should never be enough, considering what they are.
"They still could have done a shit job, but they didn't. They made a great song out of it."
You missed my entire point, didn't you? Yes.
"Thirteenth Step IS the better album."
"I have no evidence? Who said I needed it? I believe it's musically superior to Mer De Noms, you do not. Simple."
Which is it? You're contradicting your beliefs. Either you say it is, unequivocally, better, or you say we have differing opinions, which would imply that neither belief is right nor wrong.
And, actually, if you're going to make the claim that something is musically superior, you really should have evidence. If you're willing to write it off as your (uninformed, uneducated, absurd) opinion, then no, you don't need evidence.
*kisses*
-Smitten Kitten-