This is horrible... Google should change this

Originally posted by $¥®€Ñ
AAARRGGHH!!!!!!!

I've just realised I am TOTALLY wrong......

I thought of a crocodile opening it's jaws........ 😮

S.HIT.........

It takes a strong person to admit when one is wrong and even more so to do something about it!

*Note to self respect Syren 120% more than before!*

Heh...

So then Jaws should be a real word.. then why does google do an auto spell search on it? 😑

😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

thats wrong

Originally posted by Dregh
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

😂 LMFAO 😂

Have you seen the French Army Knife? It has a flip up cork screw and little white flag (Note to any French I am only joking! 😛 )

Google also has algorithims that search for articles containing other close words and all it did was calculate that there were more algorithms matching Jews in that case than Jaws, and therefore it asked if you wished to change it. 😖mart:

GOOGLE IS RACIST

😂

that is funnier than sh!t 😆 and sh!t is hella funny!

Originally posted by MC Mike
Google also has algorithims that search for articles containing other close words and all it did was calculate that there were more algorithms matching Jews in that case than Jaws, and therefore it asked if you wished to change it. 😖mart:

I don't think so. Other searches, like "Where does Jaws go to die," that result in no matches don't suggest "Jews" as an alternative.

Even as I submitted that, it occured to me that I was misinterpretting you explanation. Oops.

then edit the post 😉😛

I would have, but it's always struck me as vaguely dishonest to edit away that sort of mistake as if it had never been made. It's probably just me, but we must all be allowed our idiosyncrasies

But what he was suggesting doesn't always work. Typing in "Jaws are blessed" doesn't result in Google suggesting "Jews are blessed," even though that gives more results.

They really need to have somebody make a change to the site. That is really bad.

Yeah...
And Gregory, good point! 🙂 But it's not really that big a deal 😛

Originally posted by Gregory
I would have, but it's always struck me as vaguely dishonest to edit away that sort of mistake as if it had never been made. It's probably just me, but we must all be allowed our idiosyncrasies

But what he was suggesting doesn't always work. Typing in "Jaws are blessed" doesn't result in Google suggesting "Jews are blessed," even though that gives more results.

Yes but Jaws are blessed may have a reasonable quantity, while the original search had very little and THEN there was a change.

This is the funniest thread I've seen in an age!!!!!!!!

You know, I take that back. The first search had more results. 😮

But my final arguement is that more people have used those words together compared to the other search. Or, more likely, most of the results in the first search are vague sites while the other has better sources.

Originally posted by RobBo
This is the funniest thread I've seen in an age!!!!!!!!

Thank you! 😖mart:

This is a good one. Do a search for "miserable failure" and see what the first thing that pops up is.

Awww poor Georgie 🙂