Venom vs. Clayface

I go with Venom.

As Linkalicious pointed out, Venom has easier access to
anti-Clayface weapons and devices, than Clayface does
to anti-Venom ones.

Also, Venom has fouhgt plenty of other super-humans,
while CLayface usually just fights Batman.

I don't know if Venom needs to breathe or not. If so, then
maybe Clayfae, if he captures him, can drown him in mud?

Boris Karlo, the Ultimate Clayface has the following powers:

Superstrenght

Fire producing power

Able to take anyones powers that he morphs into

Cannot be harmed by psychical force

An poisonous touch

Shapeshifting

He could beat Venom.

Originally posted by Linkalicious
I said it in that thread, and I'll say it in this thread.

A poisonous bite is absolute garbage. In all of his history Venom has never shown himself to have a poisonous bite. Although I do feel it would help explain the green drool....it just doesn't cut if for me because he has never used such a tactic in the past.

yeah, he's never bitten someone and had a poisonous effect... BUT he has used his poisonous fumes in the past, which are just a natural effect of the symbiote. Perhaps by injecting part of the symbiote (as a liquid) into a person who wasnt a host, it would act like the "poison", because it never really came out and said what that was...

If batman can cream him then Venom can too.

There are five clayfaces, at least 3 of them could do it. I forget which one disintegrates people just by touching them.

Eddie Brock -VS- Boris Carlo

Round 1: Neutral setting (0.5 km apart, empty plain field)

Round 2: Bloodlust ON, BFR OFF. Both combatants DON'T know their opponent's strengths and weaknesses.

Round 3: Bloodlust OFF, BFR OFF. Both combatants know their opponent's strenghts, but not their weaknesses.