hey jackstain you are dumb scum do you understand that i mean i'm only 15 and i still can speak better english than you it seems you must be related to george bush or something because your so dumb and your insults are about as funny as dysentary I would rather beat my tounge wafer thin with a staek tenderizer and pin it to the floor with a croquet hoop than ever talk to you you are single minded and cant have a decent conversation with your self so piss of
Just felt I would make a few gramatical corrections.
Hey Jackstain,
You are dumb scum. Do you understand that I mean I'm only 15 and I still can speak better English than you. It seems you must be related to George Bush or something because your so dumb and your insults are about as funny as dysentery. I would rather beat my tongue wafer thin with a steak tenderizer and pin it to the floor with a croquet hoop than ever talk to you. You are single minded and can’t have a decent conversation with your self so piss off.
I found 20 gramatical mistakes. Of my fourth grade gramar chart you score a 57. That sucks. When I was in fourth grade I got an all time personal low of 88, and a gramar average of 93. I would suggest to you that when you are making a post about how horrible someone's gramar is you make sure that your gramar is better. You know, have your Mama check it or something.
By the way I am only 13.
Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Hey, I tried to be a neutral in this, but pr1983, you are losing pretty bad.
I am making a decent argument...
Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Enterprise-D weapons approx. 3.6 GW (5.1 MW per emitter, 200 emitters in the main phaser array, 2 full-sized saucer arrays and 3 smaller roughly half-size arrays on the stardrive section. the Slave 1 has roughly twice the fircepower of the milleniuum falcon. the slave one has Main guns: 64000 GW (2 kilotons per shot, 480 rpm firing rate onscreen in AOTC for time-averaged power output rather than peak output
you are kidding me right?
Originally posted by Darth_Janus
It takes about two and a half minutes to make the Enterprise fire. Takes about five to ten minutes to try and set up a firing pattern. Takes a few seconds for Chewie to shoot the damn enormous Enterprise. End of argument.
not true, once the weapons are charged (quicker than two and a half minutes), they can lock and fire in seconds...
you want proof, watch the last two seasons of deep space nine...
Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Enterprise-D= Reactor power: ~4 billion GW at max warp 9.6
millenium falcon = about 7 billion GW
Enterprise-D= Shield heat dissipation: 3311 GW peak
millenium falcon = 2 billion GW peak
can i have this link please?
Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
enterprise-d= engagements at ranges of 5 km or less
millenniuum falcon= combat initially occurs at ranges of a few thousands kilometres, eventually closing to a few hundred kilometres ("point blank" according to Lando)
no, it is a lot more than 5 km...
Originally posted by Darth_Janus
Yeah, ownage. It's official. Here's where someone runs up and says "Star Trek rules! Kirk gets laid! Star Wars is a farse!" and then runs back to his mom's basement to fume with his geek posse and their forehead make up.
What you failed to realise is that i am a star wars fan as much if not moreso than a star trek fan...
Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
GCS shields cannot deflect the heat of atmospheric re-entry, and the hull will heat up dramatically even before shields fail. Millenniuum Falcon does atmospheric re-entry several times a day in some case and recieves no damage
watch voyager, or any star trek episode where a shuttlecraft goes through an atmosphere...
you are an idiot. i said GCS. that means Galaxy class. this is about the enterprise, not voyager. I have seen the last two episodes of DS9 and stand by my facts. the link is stardestroyer.net. PM me if it dosen't work.
You also seem to have a lot of Star Trek fans to stand by considering no one defended star trek in my star trek sucks thread.
The Falcon is barely falling apart. It's not in prime condition, but she gets the job done.
Second, bigger is not always better. In this case, it's a clear weakness, since the Falcon is nimble and light and able to attack the collosal and rather slow, I might add, Enterprise from all angles while presenting a very small target in turn.
As far as the Enterprise being faster, this myth has already been laid to rest. It's slower. A lot slower. And less manueverable. And its weapons are made to fire at rather slow moving targets.