British Election

Started by jaden1012 pages

going back to the tuition fees...i find it shockingly hypocritical that the people who made the decision ti implement them are the same people who benefited from a free university education themselves...yet they will happily deny it to others now...it seems like a method of reinstalling massive class divide...those who can afford to go to the best universities can...and those who can even afford to go to the crap universities dont...even if they are the more intelligent

going back to baracustatic's point about tax

we are already the most highly taxed nation in the EU...and relatively we have some of the poorest public services

where does the money go...

total the number of scottish MSP's with the number of MP's and the number of MEP's then we are hitting 700-800 people...to bring in legislation for a country of 50million...talk about overkill...

think about this...we pay on average 70% more council tax per household...yet 3 inches of snow can bring the country to its knees because most of the gritters and ploughs have been scraped...it takes an eternity to get a broken street light fixed....or a lift in a council run multi story block of flats repaired when it breaks down

not to mention the absolutely gigantic sums of money that get wasted on pointless jobs in the public sector

a great example of which being the fact that 2 days after saddam was overthrown in iraq...the government in its almighty wisdom sent over to iraq the much need...GENDER EQUALITY CO-ORDINATORS to make sure that iraqi women got a fair deal...these 2 people got paid about 60 grand a year each...soldiers get a quarter of thatb amount

Originally posted by baracustastic
Yep, all education. The thing is LONG TERM the student is the tax payer who as a result of getting a higher wage because of his education pays more taxes and so sustains the system that got him what he has.

Well, saying 'all education' is just nonsense. I don't see why I should have to pay tax money towards someone who takes Pilates or Crochet classes at a community college, which is never going to beneift anyomne other than the hobbies of the person concerned. And saying that students get higher wages and so end up paying higher taxes is a. making an assumption that education equals better pay, which only works with a very narrow part of education, and b. assuming that paying taxes later in life is a reason to get hand outs in advance, which simply defies economic sense. Besides which, you can just flip that around and say that if they are going to get paid more, then they will easily make back the cost of their education, so they don't need the earlier handout.

You have to start defining what sort of education you mean for your point to even begin to make sense. However, once you o that you'll find it is impossible to actually hammer down what is or is not 'useful' Higher or Further education.

" like a method of reinstalling massive class divide...those who can afford to go to the best universities can...and those who can even afford to go to the crap universities dont...even if they are the more intelligent"

Nonsensical scare-mongering. No-one will ever not go to university because they can't afford it. Only those who can afford it pay tuition fees, and in any case everyone can get an interest-free loan to cover the costs and pay it back at their leisure later, which is far more sensible than trying to work out some obscure "hopefully they will pay more tax later" idea.

Anyway- this is all totally academic, because no-one- NO-ONE- is going to raise the taxes needed to eliminate tuution fees- the Lib Dems may bluster, but let them waste their time doing so. They are here to stay. Damn good thing too. The idea you should get that kind of thing for free is absurd. As I say, it is already massively subsidised, and you can get the money loaned to you in advance for NO cost to pay back when you can. It is already a superbly generous system and I cannot see any reasonable cause for complaint.

Post-compulsory education should NOT be funded by the taxpayer unless it is an essential skill (i.e. Literacy and Numeracy). Simple as that, and that is how it is always going to be.

Originally posted by jaden101
it seems like a method of reinstalling massive class divide...those who can afford to go to the best universities can...and those who can even afford to go to the crap universities dont...even if they are the more intelligent

And that is exactly what it is. There are plenty of people who do not have parents of middle class that have the brains and the ambition to finish university, yet the tuition fees do not allow this.

I consider myself lucky to have the oppertunity to go to university and soon I will be going for my masters, as many people who are as gifted as me and more do not have the opertunity due to not haveing the money to pay for education.

Its sad, but true.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
UK students have always been ridiculously vocal about tuition fees. In fact what they pay is relatively minute by higer education standards. They don't know how lucky they are.

Imo, the United Kingdom has a relatively high tuition fee.

Nonsensical scare-mongering. No-one will ever not go to university because they can't afford it.

strange...several people from the course i am on have already dropped out due to financial problems

yes you can get loan...yes they are interest free...and yes the threshold for paying them back has increased from £10,000 to £15,000

but the amount paid back is 9% of earnings once above that limit

http://www.inlandrevenue.gov.uk/employers/student_loans.htm#2

i for one was lucky in that i worked full time for 7 years before going to university and managed to save £20,000 in that time...which just about covers my costs for being at university

Damn good thing too. The idea you should get that kind of thing for free is absurd.

so the fact that it has been free for several generations and was perfectly affordable is absurd with lower taxes

ssuming that paying taxes later in life is a reason to get hand outs in advance, which simply defies economic sense

that sounds pretty much spot on was to what happens with thousands of chavs and junkies with regards to the benefits system...many of which have never paid a pennys tax in their lives yet have a better standard of living than most students living away from home

Here's my very poor (but honest) reason for voting Labour this time round: -

Gordon Brown was the only politician approached to agree to do an interview on soccer-am, called "what I know about football". He's a man of the people!

Hes a moron. 😠

Sorry but myself and almost every other student who votes will vote against labour.

Lazy bloody students, get a job and stop mooching offa society... and stop listening to the Levellers too! 😛

Seriously though, even as a student myself I think we should pay for higher education. The more you learn, the more you earn: so we should pay for the privilege.

Originally posted by mechmoggy
Seriously though, even as a student myself I think we should pay for higher education. The more you learn, the more you earn: so we should pay for the privilege.

...and the working class will never get the chance to earn that kind of money because they cannot aford to send their kid to university no mater how gifted.

Wait....you mean....the British have an election?

Damn...and here I am thinking they just put whoever Bush wanted into power...

Plot thickens

Originally posted by Linkalicious
Wait....you mean....the British have an election?

Damn...and here I am thinking they just put whoever Bush wanted into power...

Plot thickens

Nope, you're confusing Britain with America...in America its whoever Bush wants into power...in this case, his son.

I wouldn't call it an election.

A bunch of morons contesting to who has political control of the country and we're forced to vote for a lesser of two or more evils.

-AC

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
...and the working class will never get the chance to earn that kind of money because they cannot aford to send their kid to university no mater how gifted.

Not every Uni will hike their prices up that high, they'll price themselves out of any business. Only the elite Uni's will take the pish with their prices, but then people getting a qualification from those Uni's will get highly paid jobs when they leave.

I sometimes think that Uni these days has become an excuse to leave home and drink heavily for 3-4 years before having to be responisble.

Anyway, what's wrong with doing it the true working class way of working and studying part time, like me? 😄

bottom line: CHARGING MONEY FOR SOMETHNG LIMITS THOSE WHO CAN USE IT!

This is a bad thing! It doesn't allow the nation to make the most of it's human resources.

Very true.... very true.