Pre-May 19th EP 3 reviews (LOADED with SPOILERS!!)

Started by cal316 pages

Here's one from Variety.com: The Force returns with most of its original power regained in "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith." Concluding entry in George LucasGeorge Lucas' second three-pack of space epics teems with action, drama and spectacle, and even supplies the odd surge of emotion, as young Anakin Skywalker goes over to the Dark Side and the stage is set for the generation of stories launched by the original "Star Wars" 28 years ago. Whatever one thought of the previous two installments, this dynamic picture irons out most of the problems, and emerges as the best in the overall series since "The Empire Strikes Back." Stratospheric B.O.B.O. is a given.

Indeed, "Sith" looks likely to follow the commercial pattern of the initial trilogy, wherein the second edition, "Empire," dipped considerably from the first, only to see the third, "Return of the Jedi," bounce back closer to the level of "Star Wars." In the case of the most recent set, "The Phantom Menace" grossed $921 million worldwide (slightly more coming from foreign territories than from the U.S.), while "Attack of the Clones" slipped to a $647 million worldwide cume. There's little doubt "Sith" will significantly improve on the latter figure.

Everyone who has followed the "Star Wars" saga over the years will come to this film knowing that it all has to pay off here: the transformation from Anakin into Darth Vader, the face-off between Anakin/Vader and his mentor Obi-Wan Kenobi, the morphing of the Republic into the Empire, the exile of Yoda and Padme's birth of the twins Luke and Leia, siblings who become the central figures in episodes 4-6.

Given the general awareness of what's going to happen, it's up to Lucas to make it exciting. Despite fans' varying degrees of loss of faith that set in with "Menace" and "Clones," most will be inspired enough to believe again.

As if deliberately setting out to reassert his mastery over his iconic creation, Lucas opens with an amazing shot of his two Jedi Knights, Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregorEwan McGregor) and Anakin (Hayden ChristensenHayden Christensen), threading their little spaceships through an extraordinary maze of explosions and airborne craft.

In fact, the initial 23 minutes virtually constitute one eye-popping action sequence, as the Jedis fight an assortment of battles to rescue the kidnapped Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) from the clutches of the skeletal separatist General Grievous.

When things settle down to reunite Anakin with Padme, who announces she's pregnant after the idyllic secret wedding that climaxed "Clones," one is briefly reminded of Lucas' shortcomings as a writer and director of intimate, one-on-one scenes. But it's a minor problem here, as the dynamic of onrushing events soon becomes all-enveloping, and several interconnected conflicts are brought to a head.

As was not always the case the last two times out, Lucas' storytelling sense is admirable as he lays out the growing schism between the Jedi council -- which supports the Republic -- and the Chancellor, who has been granted exceptional powers in the current crisis.

Caught in the middle is Anakin, trained all his life by Obi-Wan to be an exemplary Jedi, but suddenly plagued by dreams of his wife's death in childbirth, offended by the Council's refusal to grant him master status and susceptible to the Chancellor's promise that only through the attainment of dark powers can he save his wife.

As Anakin stews, Jedis led by Obi-Wan attack General Grievous, which occasions more spectacular lightsaber fights (the movie is full of them). When Jedi Knight Mace Windu (Samuel L. JacksonSamuel L. Jackson, finally given something to do) attacks the Chancellor after learning he's a Sith Lord, Anakin must decide once and for all where his allegiance lies, his ultimate choice pitting him tragically against those closest to him, Padme and Obi-Wan.

Picture's final hour is steeped in apocalyptic imagery, tragic pop mythology and effective cross-cutting, as Yoda takes on the Chancellor at the same time Anakin/Vader engages in ferocious combat with Obi-Wan.

Resolution of the latter is significantly gorier than anything previously seen in the "Star Wars" sextet, thereby earning the series' first PG-13 rating. It also results in the transfixing final metamorphoses of Anakin into the black hooded-and-caped Vader unseen since the initial trilogy, an emergence dramatically contrasted with the birth of the twins.

Entertaining from start to finish and even enthralling at times, "Sith" has some acting worth writing home about, specifically McDiarmid's dominant turn as the mastermind of the evil empire. McGregor remains a steady presence, and both Portman and Christensen have loosened up since "Clones" to acceptable, if hardly inspired, levels. Expressiveness of the digitally animated Yoda, voiced as always by Frank OzFrank Oz, is amazing.

The technical achievement here is on such a high level that one is lulled into taking it for granted. Neither of the digitally shot recent episodes has looked consistently great, but this one does.

Perhaps this is the moment to remember it was the original "Star Wars," modest budget and all, that forever raised the bar and set the standard for the new generation of special and visual effects (a taste of "Star Wars" decor is provided by a reproduction of the gleaming white interior of the escaping Jedis' spacecraft). Composer John Williams also seems to have put extra effort into his virtually continuous score, which increasingly invests familiar themes with darker and richer tones.

two 8/10's from comingsoon.net:

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/reviewsnews.php?id=9479 (I'm pretty sure this is the same as one of the TFN ones...)
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/reviewsnews.php?id=9489

Hey guys, here is a review from a critic I like, James Beradinelli. He liked the first two Star Wars, and gave this one ***1/2. You should check it out:

http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/s/sw2005.html

On his site too is a defense of the first two movies, since they get slammed a lot, for some good reasons in my opinion, but overall I like them.

I can't wait. I have read the book, watched the TV ads, read ever review I could find, and bought the soundtrack. I almost wish I hadn't. Not because of spoilers, but because now I can hardly wait. I am almost at the point of screaming at times.

another AICN review (a Q and A actually): http://www.aintitcoolnews.com/display.cgi?id=20185

I like this paragraph... so true:

Putting it another way: The first two prequels are what I call "landing strut" movies. Before digital effects, showing a spaceship extending its landing gear and plomping to the ground with any sort of believable physical weight was difficult; you only see it a few times in the original trilogy, and most of that turns up in "Return of the Jedi." But the prequels are just chock-full of landings and gear-extending and dust kick-ups, and a landing sequence was actually lengthened in "The Empire Strikes Back Special Edition." Is this because showing these landings was somehow crucial to the advancement of the story? No; it's because ILM now had the technical ability to show them. And of course, in narrative terms, it plays like a movie full of people parking their cars. "Revenge of the Sith" mostly avoids that, despite featuring an unholy amount of commuting - more than in the previous two prequels combined, I think.

Here is the transcript to the Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper
review to ROTS.(Two thumbs up!!!!)

Show opens with a scene from the battle of Kashyyk.

Roeper: The most anticipated movie of the year, the decade, the century, finally comes to theaters...I'm Richard Roper

Ebert: And I'm Roger Ebert. Well here it is at last "Star Wars Episode 3 Revenge of the Sith". It opens Wednesday at midnight. This is an early review, after 28 years the Star Wars series concludes with a final shot showing two characters facing a dawn of what we know will be parts 4,5 and 6.

By starting in the middle and returning to the beginning, Lucas loses some suspence since we already know that Anakin Skywalker will become Darth Vader.

But the transition is in a way all the more facinating as we see a younger and a more innocent Anakin (played by Haden Christensen)in love with Padme (played by Natalie Portman).

Their twins will be the future Luke Skywalker and Princess Leia. As the movie opens, Anakin and a young Obi-Wan Kenobi (played by Ewan MacGregor)are flying to the rescue of the kidnapped Chancellor Palpatine.

Palpatine (played by Ian McDermid)has an uneasy relationship with the Jedi Council and tries to shake Anakin's loyalty to the Jedi.

Can Anakin be trusted? Mace Windu, Obi Wan and Yoda have their doubts about this untested young man.

That's Samuel L. Jackson as the powerful Jedi Master Mace Windu and of course Frank Oz as the voice of Yoda.

Finally the hostility surfaces in a duel to the death on a firey volcanic planet.

Revenge of the Sith is filled with action, including a thrilling dogfight, a sensational crash landing, maybe a little more dueling by lightsabers than you really need since since the swordsman are so good it takes forever for anyone to actually get hurt.

The weakness is in the dialogue. It's flat when it should be poetic and exciting. They seem to be working from a limited vocabulary of basic english.

This would be a bigger problem if the characters spoke more but they don't, except for Chancellor Palpatine who is eloquent and snakey as he seduces Anakin over to the Dark Side.

Thumbs Up

ROEPER: Yeah the Chancellor is the real villan in this chapter. Big thumbs up for me Roger. And you're right about the dialogue THAT'S ALWAYS BEEN A WEAKNESS IN THESE MOVIES.

But that's a small part of this saga. I do like the action sequences alot. I think this movie has something that the most recent two had none of and that is it has a heart. It really does. I mean the Natalie Portman character Padme..

EBERT: Yeah

ROEPER: I mean she's playing this as real drama. She's seen the man she loves going to the dark side and it's really breaking her heart and it feels authentic.

EBERT: Yeah, the last third of the movie is stronger thanks to that emotional content. But at the same time I wish that in a way he(Lucas) would have pumped up the dialogue you have people saying things like 'They're worried about you, they think you're under too much stress'. I mean come on.

ROEPER: Yeah. Hey absolutley

EBERT: I mean its just pedestrian clunky dialogue.

ROEPER: Maybe they should have brought someone like David Mamet to punch it up

EBERT: Somebody like Jackson (Samuel L.) is such an eloquent actor and here he is just intoning. THAT'S JUST A WEAKNESS OF THE SERIES.

ROEPER: But of the recent movies this is the best...

EBERT: Yes it is

ROEPER: I actually think it's the best one since Empire Strikes Back. Maybe the third best out of the 6.

EBERT: What this one does, it goes back to the great tradition of Space Opera, and action, and science fiction and gets out of those long dialogue passages that were not only badly written but also endless.

ROEPER: Yeah and as you mentioned of course the suspense isn't all quite there because we know what's going to happen.

EBERT: Yeah we know

ROEPER: But that also gives the scenes alot more resonance.

EBERT: The scene where Anakin turns into Darth Vader and how that mask is applied ...

ROEPER: Powerful stuff

EBERT:....that's a good scene.

ROEPER: So two thumbs up for Star Wars.

Originally posted by vanyoda
Here is the transcript to the Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper
review to ROTS.(Two thumbs up!!!!)

Awesome

I know. So many good reviews, and only a few negitive ones. I can't wait.

I cracked up when Ebert said

'Revenge of the Sith is filled with action, including a thrilling dogfight, a sensational crash landing, maybe a little more dueling by lightsabers than you really need since since the swordsman are so good it takes forever for anyone to actually get hurt.'

Originally posted by LandoSpeeder2
I cracked up when Ebert said

'Revenge of the Sith is filled with action, including a thrilling dogfight, a sensational crash landing, maybe a little more dueling by lightsabers than you really need since since the swordsman are so good it takes forever for anyone to actually get hurt.'

I know, that was funny stuff.

It's true though, they duel so well they are almost perfectly matched.

That's really funny. He's really great.

I'm very pleased that Ebert liked it, and also said it was the best prequel, meaning he'll probably give it ***1/2, since he gave Episode 1 that.

Here's one that had me fuming. I dont mind if people dont enjoy the movies like i do, each to their own. But this guy is a law unto himself. He has no interest in trying to get into the story and this leads to him missing many key points. Here judge for yourself:

http://www.newyorker.com/critics/cinema/articles/050523crci_cinema

Way to be objective shithead!

Arizona Republic review....

Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith

Bill Muller
The Arizona Republic
May. 16, 2005 09:16 AM

Star Wars Episode III: The Buildup

It took 22 years, but the Jedi has finally returned.

With Star Wars: Episode III — Revenge of the Sith, director George Lucas has delivered the movie that everyone wanted, from the aging fans of the first trilogy to the young followers recruited by the more recent films. advertisement

In an exhilarating 2 1/2 hours, with hardly a misstep, Lucas erases the crushing disappointment of The Phantom Menace - and the ambivalence toward Attack of the Clones. With this last film, which links the trilogies, he reminds us what it was like to be 12 years old in 1977, sitting in a darkened theater and watching that giant spaceship pass over our heads in the original Star Wars.

In short, Lucas has gone home, and he's taking us with him.

If you did see the first Star Wars as a kid, you've probably never completely turned your back on Lucas, even after waiting 16 years after Return of the Jedi for a sequel, and then finding out it was Phantom Menace, a magnificent failure in almost every respect.

But in creating Star Wars, Lucas not only showed us something beyond our imagination, he earned an eternal pass from the fans. You can criticize him for stuffy dialogue and junior high politics, but it's nearly impossible to watch the first few minutes of Revenge of the Sith without a few goose bumps.

Why? Well, Lucas cheats a little, by somewhat re-creating the opening sequence from his first movie. It's a special moment, and if anything, Lucas knows how to reference his own material. In a way, he is more fan than director, and seems to love his creation — stitch marks and all — more than anyone.

But instead of making Revenge of the Sith a special-effects movie — and you can never discount the mind-blowing look of a Star Wars film, especially this one — computers are not what holds it together.

Revenge of the Sith works because it has somewhere to go. Compared with this film, Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones seem like gaudy, stand-alone exhibits in the Star Wars museum. Revenge of the Sith is also much darker and violent, earning its PG-13 rating.

Revenge of the Sith, however, is very much a Star Wars movie because it doesn't just sit there glowing under the light of effervescent special effects. The train of Sith has a locomotive, as the plot barrels toward Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen), being twisted into the most feared movie heavy of all time, Darth Vader.

This would be enough, but there's more. Christensen (Attack of the Clones, Shattered Glass) is set loose in 'Revenge', and it turns out the young Canadian has a wealth of talent.

He's also wisely matched with British stage actor Ian McDiarmid, who provides the glue to Revenge of the Sith with a wide-ranging, twinkling performance as Chancellor Palpatine, the leader who nudges Anakin ever closer to the Dark Side. The scenes between Christensen and McDiarmid actually make us forget about all that English butler-speak from the other movies.

That's not to say Revenge of the Sith has no problems. Lucas still offers a few painful scenes of dialogue, such as when Anakin and his pregnant wife, Padmé Amidala (an underutilized Natalie Portman), argue over who loves whom more. For a second, it seems like they're following the Guiding Light rather than the Force.

And when Darth finally becomes Darth — in a fittingly operatic scene that's a cross between Frankenstein and Phantom of the Opera — he bellows out a big NOOOOO! that reminds us that Lucas occasionally could use an editor.

In A New Hope (this is what we're supposed to call the first Star Wars now), Vader, referring to the Death Star, tells an Imperial officer, “Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed.”

That's also good advice for Lucas, who sometimes overdoes it with all the computer animation. The opening battle is immense in scale, and eventually, the amount of information has us longing for the unadorned dogfights of the original movie.

With that small misgiving, it's only fair to note that Revenge of the Sith features the sharpest special effects of the series, as Lucas uses computers to furnish almost all his scenery and even occasionally to put actors' faces on stunt double bodies. (You can't tell this by watching, but Lucas doesn't mind giving away his secrets.)

As for the story, it's still a little unclear as to why everybody's fighting in the Clone Wars, except that the whole thing is a ruse for those always sneaky Sith to seize control of the galaxy.

In this chapter, Count Dooku (Christopher Lee) has kidnapped Palpatine, and Jedi Knight Anakin and his mentor, Obi-Wan (Ewan McGregor), must rescue the chancellor. They also spend a lot of time chasing Gen. Grievous, a mostly robotic leader of the droid army.

This takes us to several planets, all brought to life with staggering amounts of art direction and production design, including the Wookiees' home world of Kashyyyk, a sinkhole world on which Obi-Wan corners Grievous and a volcanic planet where Anakin and Obi-Wan finally decide to throw down the gauntlet. (Is there logic in mining lava? I'm sure Lucas could explain.)

Everyone seems more natural in this one, which makes the final lightsaber clash between Obi-Wan and Anakin all the better. McGregor, like Christensen, is more at ease, lending a reality to the scene absent from the other films.

Actually, it might sound strange to mention the word “reality” when talking about Star Wars.

But if you saw it when you were 12, you know exactly what I mean.

Good review. Sounds promising.

Good point BTW about the unclarity why everyone is fighting...