What would you think of a Batman series on HBO or some cable network so it wouldn't get watered down for the violence and the like?..Since there's sooo much stuff to cover in the Batman mythos, they could do an animated(computer animated-like MTV's Spider-man) series in continuation of the movie...keep the same actors(if possible) to do the voices and when somethin major is going to happen-like the 'death in the family' storyline-take it to the big screen.
I just purchased 'The Incredibles' recently and I've always thought about seeing Batman in that form...
Eversince I watched 'Spawn' on HBO I always wondered ''what if they did a live action or computer animated series of Batman?'
Thoughts???
Originally posted by RogueGambitdare
But you can't have a Batman sequel without a Robin. Dick Grayson makes it O so interesting. You can't have a Batman without a Robin.
ya gotta have Dick....thought I wish they'd just make him NIghtwing and bring in Tim Drake...they can skip over Jason Todd no one likes him...but the could show flash backs of Dick as Robin....hopefully people watching the movie could catch on.
Originally posted by Kainreaver
Mr. Freeze should be played by the one who should have played him in the first place...Patrick Stuart.
you read my mind grasshopper character50
I want to see Clayface and Scarface..the puppet dude..and Bane should be redone...right this time..he's a smart guy not some 3rd rate thug.
I have never. NEVER. Heard of a series of more than three that ever turned out good (Unless if Potter can pull it off?). My opinion is if this Batman series was MEANT to be a trilogy from the beginning it should be but if it wasn't then it shouldn't.
Movie history proves I’m right. The first BATMAN movie ended perfectly but they wanted more money and ****ed that up. Shrek 2 sucked because that's not how it was meant to be from the beginning, they just wanted more money. Don't get me started on Superman. The Spider Man movies are being done BRILLIANTLY so far, and they seem to be home free with number three because it was MEANT to be a trilogy. Star Wars ****ed up since "Star Wars Episode Whatever: Something Something" because the original Star Wars series weren't called "Star Wars 4-6: Whatever Whatever". ****. Only the FIRST title was meant to be "Star Wars" anyways. The prequels should've been called "The Phantom Menace", "Attack of the Clones", and "Revenge of the Sith" without anything added to the title. Star Wars has appeared to recovered from past mistakes though since the huge, "Let-me-put-all-my-GOOD-ideas-into-the-last-movie" George-Lucas-style success of "Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith".
I don't think the Begins series should have a Robin in it. He wasn't in the first, original comics and he's GAY. I was laughing my ass off with my friends when I was five when we saw "Batman Forever" and heard Alfred going like "Master DICK, how are you young man?" LMAO and in the animated series where they're like "OH NO, DICK IS HURT!!" or "OH MY GOD, DICK FELL!!!". I think we had jokes like that in school running until 1997. Titans pulls him off well by not calling him by his first name at all, and I think it's awesome how he's reborn as "Robin". If they DID have him in the movies though, I saw we just call him "Grayson". Though, that too, is one letter more than "Gayson".
I pray to god to grant me ONE solid The Bat Man triology where the "Dark at in the first one, gayer as time goes on" curse is lifted and I could just have The Bat Man from the begining to ending in a perfect, kick-ass triology.
Later I'd have all the geeky comic book guys have a field day with a new series that comes out a year later with happy-go-lucky campy Adam West style movies that fails miserably to be "Serious" with such rediculous plots (See: "BATMAN & ROBIN", old Batman comics before the more-serious "Detetive Comics" before Kane got semi-fired) with Bat Nipples, Dick Gayson, BATGIRL!!!, the purrfect Catwoman with fake plastic Juggernauts (LIKE FROM X-MEN!!!!!), 70's Pimped out Nightwing, Bat signal's on the moon, exploding sharks, a constant rotation of movie stars having their flawless reputation shattered in one movie for four movies, constantly changing actors with movies can barely pass as sequels with eachother with no connecting plot to make the next movie pick up where the last movie left off, ending the.. "Four-logy" I'll call it, barely gross in $130 million on a film that cost $100 million to make. Then you know what comic-fans would say? “HOW”S THAT FOR BEING TRUE TO THE COMICS!??!?!?!?!?!?”
*watches spiderman*
Any idea what would be good titles for the sequels? They can't make it Batman Begins 2 and Batman Begins 3...lol
Batman Continues
Batman Again
?
I haven't been able to think of anything that doesn't sound ridiculous like that lol unless they call it like
Batman: Revenge
something about crusades...idk.
Any ideas?
Actually its a great idea.To not make at least one Batman sequel in the future without Robin would be treason.Robin hardly equals death of Batman.Only bad casting choices in bad storys-can you say-Batman and Robin movie? equal death of Batman.and it was the storyline of Batman and Robin that ended the franchise not Robin.to the original post on this thread,errr no,lets not have Robin become Nightwing.Leave that crap for the cartoons and comics. Robin is a great charater if they get the right actor.Chirs O'donnel was just a horrible choice for the role because he sucks as an actor and was wayyyy too old for the role.