U.S. Figures Show Sharp Global Rise In Terrorism

Started by PVS3 pages

U.S. Figures Show Sharp Global Rise In Terrorism

April 27th, 2005 6:03 pm
U.S. Figures Show Sharp Global Rise In Terrorism/
State Dept. Will Not Put Data in Report

By Susan B. Glasser / Washington Post

The number of serious international terrorist incidents more than tripled last year, according to U.S. government figures, a sharp upswing in deadly attacks that the State Department has decided not to make public in its annual report on terrorism due to Congress this week.

Overall, the number of what the U.S. government considers "significant" attacks grew to about 655 last year, up from the record of around 175 in 2003, according to congressional aides who were briefed on statistics covering incidents including the bloody school seizure in Russia and violence related to the disputed Indian territory of Kashmir.

Terrorist incidents in Iraq also dramatically increased, from 22 attacks to 198, or nine times the previous year's total -- a sensitive subset of the tally, given the Bush administration's assertion that the situation there had stabilized significantly after the U.S. handover of political authority to an interim Iraqi government last summer.

The State Department announced last week that it was breaking with tradition in withholding the statistics on terrorist attacks from its congressionally mandated annual report. Critics said the move was designed to shield the government from questions about the success of its effort to combat terrorism by eliminating what amounted to the only year-to-year benchmark of progress.

Although the State Department said the data would still be made public by the new National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), which prepares the information, officials at the center said no decision to publish the statistics has been made.

The controversy comes a year after the State Department retracted its annual terrorism report and admitted that its initial version vastly understated the number of incidents. That became an election-year issue, as Democrats said the Bush administration tried to inflate its success in curbing global terrorism after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

"Last year was bad. This year is worse. They are deliberately trying to withhold data because it shows that as far as the war on terrorism internationally, we're losing," said Larry C. Johnson, a former senior State Department counterterrorism official, who first revealed the decision not to publish the data.

After a week of complaints from Congress, top aides from the State Department and the NCTC were dispatched to the Hill on Monday for a private briefing. There they acknowledged for the first time the increase in terrorist incidents, calling it a "dramatic uptick," according to participants and a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice from Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.).

The administration aides sought to explain the rise in attacks as the result of more inclusive methodology in counting incidents, which they argued made year-to-year comparisons "increasingly problematic," sources said.

In his letter urging Rice to release the data, Waxman said that "the large increases in terrorist attacks reported in 2004 may undermine administration claims of success in the war on terror, but political inconvenience has never been a legitimate basis for withholding facts from the American people."

Both Republican and Democratic aides at the meeting criticized what a GOP attendee called the "absurd" explanation offered by the State Department's acting counterterrorism chief, Karen Aguilar, that the statistics are not relevant to the required report on trends in global terrorism. "It's absurd to issue a report without statistics," said the aide, who is not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. "This is a self-inflicted wound by the State Department."

Aguilar, according to Hill aides, told them that Rice decided to withhold the statistics on the recommendation of her counselor, Philip D. Zelikow. He was executive director of the Sept. 11 commission that investigated the terrorist attacks on the United States.

The terrorism statistics provided to the congressional aides were not classified but were stamped "for official use only." Last week, State Department spokesman Richard A. Boucher said the government would publish "all the facts," but at Monday's session Aguilar told the staff members that even if the NCTC decided not to release the data, the State Department would not reconsider and publicly do so itself.

A State Department spokesman said last night that he is confident the data will be officially released. He said the government is committed to "providing the public all the information it needs to have an informed debate on this issue."

Under the standards used by the government, "significant" terrorist attacks are defined as those that cause civilian casualties or fatalities or substantial damage to property. Attacks on uniformed military personnel such as the large number of U.S. troops stationed in Iraq are not included.

The data provided to the congressional aides also showed terrorist attacks doubling over the previous year in Afghanistan, to 27 significant incidents, and in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank, where attacks rose to about 45, from 19 the year before. Also occurring last year were such deadly attacks as the seizure of a school in Beslan, Russia, by Chechen militants that resulted in at least 330 dead, and the Madrid train bombings that left nearly 200 dead.

The State Department did not disclose to the aides the overall number of those killed in incidents last year. Johnson said his count shows it was well over 1,000.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/26/AR2005042601623.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

hilights for those with a.d.d.:

-The number of serious international terrorist incidents more than tripled last year...

-Terrorist incidents in Iraq also dramatically increased, from 22 attacks to 198, or nine times the previous year's total

-The State Department announced last week that it was breaking with tradition in withholding the statistics on terrorist attacks from its congressionally mandated annual report.

-The controversy comes a year after the State Department retracted its annual terrorism report and admitted that its initial version vastly understated the number of incidents. (election year...surprise surprise)

-Last week, State Department spokesman Richard A. Boucher said the government would publish "all the facts," but at Monday's session Aguilar told the staff members that even if the NCTC decided not to release the data, the State Department would not reconsider and publicly do so itself.

-Attacks on uniformed military personnel such as the large number of U.S. troops stationed in Iraq are not included. (as a terrorist attack)

-The data provided to the congressional aides also showed terrorist attacks doubling over the previous year in Afghanistan, to 27 significant incidents, and in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank,The data provided to the congressional aides also showed terrorist attacks doubling over the previous year in Afghanistan, to 27 significant incidents, and in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank...

Of course they increased...

Doing the things that makes terrorist hate you won't really lower the amount of terrorists.

Why they refuse to release data like this is beyond me however. Well its not i wouldn't have expected anything else from those guys. But thats just insane

No suprise, but i can't wait to see people come in here, deny the above information, and then defend Bush's actions and results.

Alright, I'm here to deny the information!

Do I have to read the article to do that?

U.S. Figures Show Sharp Global Rise In Terrorism
and the surprise here is?................................................ 😂 sorry I just had to

Originally posted by botankus
Alright, I'm here to deny the information!

Do I have to read the article to do that?

well, the proper procedure would be:

1-read the first sentence and assume what the rest of the article is about

2-if the assumed topic makes bush look good, declare that this is proof that liberals are full of shit

3-if the assumed topic makes bush look bad, declare that this is just bullshit from the bias liberal media, and shame on the unamerican who posted it...etc.

4-answer any challenge to your comments with overused nonesense slogans like 'if you hate america so much, then leave'.

5-if you find yourself in a corner with nothing to defend your point, simply call everyone 'liberal pussies' and/or shout 'FOUR MORE YEARS' and run away, never looking back.

(©the right wing nut school of debate handbook)

😆 good stuff pvs

how do you get the copyright sign?

on a mac its option-g
i dont know about on a PC.
if you find out let me know

it doesnt have the option, guess mac is so paranoid about copyright they added it to the function buttons😄

© Ctrl+Alt+C

nope, not on the keyboard at work

but what's important is that America isn't getting attack at home...

duh!!!!

What is it that Bush would say on terrorism: "A safer world, a safer America"?

Originally posted by Linkalicious
but what's important is that America isn't getting attack at home...

duh!!!!

So long as the rest of the world is being attacked (including americans abroad) and not the mainland U.S. who cares right?

The U.S. will be attacked again, but not right away. Also the attempts and successes of terrorism in america has escalated each time. Kinda makes you wonder what they're gonna do next eh?

nuke nukenuke

Originally posted by Linkalicious
but what's important is that America isn't getting attack at home...

duh!!!!

For how long?

Yeah i think its only a matter of time before either the U.S gets another attack or Great Britain gets one 🙁

As long as Extremists exists Terrorism will exist. There really is no way to stop them.

things have to get worse before they get better.