Linkalicious
Iran...I Walked...I Jihad
Originally posted by Deano
yeh but bush is ten times worse as blair
Who's actually worst. The leader who risks the lives of his people to fulfill his OWN agenda, or the leader who risks the lives of his people to fulfill the someone else's agenda.
At least Bush makes his own decisions. Blair lets Bush make his decisions for him.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The difference is:One of your candidates was a warmongering psychopath, the other was a pathetic in most ways.
I just think it would have been better to elect the latter, but that's me.
Blair is a liar and Michael Howard is an accident waiting to happen, but neither are as bad as Bush.
-AC
So when are you going to point out the difference to me?
Blair is a warmongering, lying psychopath just the same as Bush. You're lying to yourself if you believe otherwise. Last time I checked Blair was the first to sign up for the "coalition of the willing" not the last.
And who's to say John Kerry was just "pathetic" and not actually a "accident waiting to happen"? Sounds like Michael Howard is just as pathetic as John Kerry if he can't win the vote over your current leader.
The similarities between our countries are astonishing, but not nearly as astonishing as the general attitude on this board that the British government is in any way better than that of the United States.