Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
I think they should stick with one bad guy at a time. The 2 villain thing killed the batman movies.
Everyone always says the fact that 2 villains were made in the Batman films made them bad...is it really that? Shouldn't you say its a poor script, bad casting, change of director/composer/attitude and whatnot? Batman Returns had 2 villains and that was good, so its not just that 2 villains are in there. If you wanna take it that way, then you should all say that Spider-Man 2 sucked because Harry was an antagonist and so was Ock. Spider-Man is different than Joel Schumacker's Batman films. Two villains can work if they're related in some way that makes sense (i.e. not Batman & Robin's excuses), and the writing, directing and acting fits it. Don't blame it on the fact that they have 2 villains, blame it on the actors and the screenwriters for not giving anybody a good strong basis to build on in the first place.
Originally posted by NoFate007
Everyone always says the fact that 2 villains were made in the Batman films made them bad...is it really that? Shouldn't you say its a poor script, bad casting, change of director/composer/attitude and whatnot? Batman Returns had 2 villains and that was good, so its not just that 2 villains are in there. If you wanna take it that way, then you should all say that Spider-Man 2 sucked because Harry was an antagonist and so was Ock. Spider-Man is different than Joel Schumacker's Batman films. Two villains can work if they're related in some way that makes sense (i.e. not Batman & Robin's excuses), and the writing, directing and acting fits it. Don't blame it on the fact that they have 2 villains, blame it on the actors and the screenwriters for not giving anybody a good strong basis to build on in the first place.
I have to agree. When your right your right, those movies were really bad.