Originally posted by Ushgarak
"Poor people will never get the chance for university - nuff said."Total lie.
Unlike Blair, who never lied in the way you make out.
This is the basic problem with the electorate- it lacks sufficient ability to discern.
But I voted Tory after all, because... frankly the local Labour candidate is terrible, and Whittingdale is a case of 'better the devil you know'.
I also abhor the idea of voting for the Lib Dems simply because you do not like Labour- their policies are in such mealy-mouthed disarry, I am absolutely convinced that people would not vote for them if they actually had a chance in hell of getting into Government. They are simply getting a protest vote.
I don't really now much about the liberal democrats so I can't give a very good opinion on them, but I doubt they are a worse party to give a protest vote to than the party that gets them in Belgium.
Its not right.
Labour won about 5 times as many seats as the lib-dems.
But, the breakdown of the votes showed:
Labour = 36 % of votes
Lib Dems = 22% of votes
it's not right.
I blame maggie thatcher, as she realised that she could get a lot more seats for just a few more voters n key areas of the countries, so she changed the boundries of the constituancies so that she would be much more likely to win.