God vs. Science: The Inclusion of Creationism in School Textbooks?

Originally posted by whobdamandog
I think you all are just a little upset because you've come across looking pretty ignorant in this debate...

Originally posted by whobdamandog
What have you evidence do you all have pray tell?

Might want to construct valid sentences before trying to take away other peoples credibility.

ah come on silver cry I was trying to get them without cheating 🙁

then as revenge, name me all the dwarfs of snowwhite without cheating 😛

Originally posted by yerssot
ah come on silver cry I was trying to get them without cheating 🙁

then as revenge, name me all the dwarfs of snowwhite without cheating 😛

Only one I couldn't remember was Prancer 😛

Umm....Dopey, Grumpy, Sleepy......damn. I haven't watched Snow White since I was 7, though 😛

Originally posted by whobdamandog
I think you all are just a little upset because you've come across looking pretty ignorant in this debate...

Yeah, referencing biased geosites webpages totally shows a degree of knowledge that we could only wish to obtain. Guess listening to the majority of actual scientists on this matter (who disagree with everything you've said) is absolutely ignorant. The truth can only be found on biased, creationalist webpages. Cherry picked data is always accurate.

You know, I could easily just go off and link you to any of the hundreds/thousands of pages dedicated to backing up evolution, many of which would completely retort what you're saying, but by doing that I'd be falling into the same argumentative fallacy as you, relying on biased, uncredible data to back up my argument. Yep, I'll just go by what the majority of those dudes known as scientists say, seeing as they've spend their entire lives studying and researching the topic at hand.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=27866&highlight=evolution

Pay special attention to The Omega's posts. In case you don't know, she is a scientist and knows what she's talking about. All the evidence you could hope for is in there.

I'm still waiting for whob's proof for creationism... wait... we were waiting for proof of that in the evolution-thread too 😄

come on silver, you can do better than that 😉

My degree is in Molecular Biology, beng a scientist does not mean you have the right answer to this question.

😄

Originally posted by Lana
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=27866&highlight=evolution

Pay special attention to The Omega's posts. In case you don't know, she is a scientist and knows what she's talking about. All the evidence you could hope for is in there.

Yerss, we're gonna be waiting a loooooong time for that proof.

And I have a really bad memory 😛 and you said I can't cheat!

....btw, you're the only person who still calls me Silver 😛

no, but that answer will be closer to the truth compared to a redneck answer

besides, we all know the 12 foot long eclair created the universe

Originally posted by whirlysplat
My degree is in Molecular Biology, beng a scientist does not mean you have the right answer to this question.

😄

It means that what they have to say is far more credible then some dude referencing webpages.

Originally posted by Lana
Yerss, we're gonna be waiting a loooooong time for that proof.

And I have a really bad memory 😛 and you said I can't cheat!

....btw, you're the only person who still calls me Silver 😛

aah, come on doc, it aint that hard 😉

I'm special that way 😊

Originally posted by yerssot
no, but that answer will be closer to the truth compared to a redneck answer

besides, we all know the 12 foot long eclair created the universe

And that the universe is shaped like a donut.

Originally posted by BackFire
It means that what they have to say is far more credible then some dude referencing webpages.

Yep.

Originally posted by yerssot
of course, we say they can't use their only source for that: the bible 😄

aah, come on doc, it aint that hard 😉

I'm special that way 😊

See, that's why creationism can't work. It relies on a belief in a higher being. If you don't believe in such a thing, creationism falls apart 😄

Yerssie, it's been 12 years since I've last seen Snow White 😛 I'm not gonna remember their names. Happy was one, right?

and that higher being is supported in their only source... but they have one last powerful weapon at their side: stubborness 😉

It's been even longer since I saw it, but you don't hear me complaining 😛 I have absolutely no idea 😑

Originally posted by Lana
Yep....the reindeer are Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, and of course, Rudolph 😛

(I had to look it up because I couldn't remember them all)

The evidence in support of our argument has been posted in here already. If you need more, go look at the evolution thread. Over 100 pages of evidence for you.

Same to you Doll..lol..

Originally posted by yerssot
I'm still waiting for whob's proof for creationism... wait... we were waiting for proof of that in the evolution-thread too 😄

come on silver, you can do better than that 😉

As I said before I gave you the same amount of proof that you've given me...

you have not given ANY proof besides your personal opinion

If you want proof for evolution, do as silver said and go to the evolution thread. If you fail to bring up any evidence, it just shows that creationism is just one big lie .... your call

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Same to you Doll..lol..

Do not call me doll. Very few people are allowed to use terms of affection with me.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
As I said before I gave you the same amount of proof that you've given me...

Your proof ISN'T proof, though. There is nothing to validate any of it. And like I said, creationism is solely reliant on a belief of a higher being, which cannot be proven to exist. If someone doesn't believe in this higher being, then creationism falls apart.

To paraphrase Einstein, "perhaps I have seen a little further because I stood on the shoulders of giants", good research for anyone comes with references. Einstein did his best work as a patents clerk.

Srinivasa Ramanujan did a lot of interesting work without a degree.

http://www.dhool.com/ennangal/resources.htm

A body of knowledge is based on research.

😄

Epistemeology/Epistomology slight difference in emphasis is the basis of scientific thought see here. This site explains the concept ok.

http://www.accessexcellence.org/RC/AB/IE/caulder.html

Sorry to use web pages but they are a good resource 😄

Originally posted by BackFire
It means that what they have to say is far more credible then some dude referencing webpages.

Originally posted by whirlysplat
To paraphrase Einstein, "perhaps I have seen a little further because I stood on the shoulders of giants", good research for anyone comes with references. Einstein did his best work as a patents clerk.

Srinivasa Ramanujan did a lot of interesting work without a degree.

http://www.dhool.com/ennangal/resources.htm

A body of knowledge is based on research.

😄

Epistemeology/Epistomology slight difference in emphasis is the basis of scientific thought see here. This site explains the concept ok.

http://www.accessexcellence.org/RC/AB/IE/caulder.html

Sorry to use web pages but they are a good resource 😄

Webpages can be good resources, but you have to check them out. A geocities site is not generally going to be the best source of information. A site that's a .edu or .org is much more likely to be a good source, though once again, you should always check it out and try to find THEIR sources.

Originally posted by Lana
Do not call me doll. Very few people are allowed to use terms of affection with me.

Your proof ISN'T proof, though. There is nothing to validate any of it. And like I said, creationism is solely reliant on a belief of a higher being, which cannot be proven to exist. If someone doesn't believe in this higher being, then creationism falls apart.

Sorry sweety...but your proof isn't proof either...your belief is solely reliant on transitionary fossils..and no valid ones have been found..don't you just love circular arguments..