Originally posted by whobdamandog
Yes..and it's substantiated by researched facts..while sad to say..BF's are admittedly not..keep the faith..😇
No, you have no facts. Simply a lot of theories.
Give me some bloody proof, then you have a fact. You just don't. Without a time machine, neither side has facts.
Originally posted by Trickster
Bollocks. Which non-Christian scientists are putting forward the idea of Creationism?
The real question is..how many scientist even believe in the evolutionary theory anymore? Answer: very few..
As for the thousands of multi-racial scientists who concur that Darwin's theory of evolution is the most likely to have occured.
All your opinion..but your welcome to it...
And even if you class Darwinism as religion, then what you're really saying is that neither should be included in a science class - both should be taught in Religous Studies.
Well we could do it that way..or to be fair..we could include them both in the science curriculum...pick your poison...either way..they both deserve to be heard.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Yes..and it's substantiated by researched facts..while sad to say..BF's are admittedly not..keep the faith..😇
Lies.
It's substatiated by researched OPINIONS of people who have poorly constructed and biased websites that have no facts presented and cherry picked data ignoring statements that may contradict their opinions.
My opinion is also supported by many scientists, AND biased webpages that I could easily reference as false facts, just like you have. Would that give me credibility? Seeing as you obviously have so much of it, with your pitiful reasoning ability and inability to construct a sound argument.
Good debating with you, keep up the fallacious reasoning and logic.
Also, please show me any "contradictions" I made in my post in which I verbally spanked you to the point of you having nothing relevent to say as a retort. I've always been interested in what sloppy debaters and liars have to say.
The difference between us? I'm admitting the truth, while you are lying. Truthfulness is far more credible then lying. Well, at least to reasonable people.
whob >
can you show me a credible source that says scientists don't believe in the evolutiontheory or will you dodge this one?
Originally posted by Trickster
Wait... It didn't?Oh shit oh shit oh shit, my entire life based on a falsehood!
Originally posted by whobdamandog
The real question is..how many scientist even believe in the evolutionary theory anymore? Answer: very few..
Congratulations on committing the logic fallacy of Appeal to Popularity. 🙄
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well we could do it that way..or to be fair..we could include them both in the science curriculum...pick your poison...either way..they both deserve to be heard.
“I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms,” Stephen J. Gould.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
As do you...
Um, who said I was on that side? I'm just pointing out flaws in your shittily thought out and immature presented arguements.
Bingo...so we're both of our beliefs just hinge on FAITH.....I knew I could get that answer out of someone..I was just wondering when...😆😆😆
Again, who said I held a different belief?
But no, it's nothing to do with faith. Faith is when you believe in something other than yourself and the way you think. If somebody took for granted what someone else was saying, then that person would have faith that the person who was speaking was telling the truth. Looking into the same thing for yourself and finding out what is most likely becomes simply your opinion.
What you are posting on is just faith and what other people have told you. Sweet second-hand arguements.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well we could do it that way..or to be fair..we could include them both in the science curriculum...pick your poison...either way..they both deserve to be heard.
Well, no, we couldn't. As you have just defined both as religion, then they fall into a completely different category of lesson.
A lesson in which, I am afraid to say, very little is absorbed by students.
Originally posted by yerssot
whob >can you show me a credible source that says scientists don't believe in the evolutiontheory or will you dodge this one?
wait a minute, I'm still making the geocities-site. In a few minutes, it'll be the truth 😆
Originally posted by BackFire
Another contradiction, whob, well done. Obviously your credibility is through the roof.
Wait, wait....
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Well I'd love to stay and chat..but I must get going for now..apparently you all have nothing else to prove other than your ability to flood the chat board...this always done by the loosing side of a debate..to take away from your untruthful/illogical/rantings....for shame..oh well...
keep the faith 😇
Originally posted by Trickster
Well, no, we couldn't. As you have just defined both as religion, then they fall into a completely different category of lesson.A lesson in which, I am afraid to say, very little is absorbed by students.
Or, if it is (as in my case who was raised Catholic), can cause them to notice all the fallacies of the bible and religion and decide it's BS 😉
Anyway. Opinions are not evidence. Researched facts are. You cannot deny the existance of fossils. Have you ever been to a Natural History museum?
For creationism to have any credibility you must first provide evidence that an intelligent being exists. Until you do that, it is nothing but a falsehood based on a religion.
Well I'd love to stay and chat..but I must get going for now..apparently you all have nothing else to prove other than your ability to flood the chat board...this always done by the loosing side of a debate..to take away from your untruthful/illogical/rantings....for shame..oh well...
Yeah, as opposed too contradictions and argumentative fallacies such as the ones you've commited blatantly are always on the winning side of the debate.
As is the person with the inability to back up anything they say, whereas they resort to trying to attack another persons credibility without paying attention or retorting their actual argument (more nifty things you've been doing).
Take care whob, running away with your tail between your legs is always the sign of a winner.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well I'd love to stay and chat..but I must get going for now..apparently you all have nothing else to prove other than your ability to flood the chat board...this always done by the loosing side of a debate..to take away from your untruthful/illogical/rantings....for shame..oh well...keep the faith 😇
One does not leave an argument when he is winning. 🙄
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well I'd love to stay and chat..but I must get going for now..apparently you all have nothing else to prove other than your ability to flood the chat board...this always done by the loosing side of a debate..to take away from your untruthful/illogical/rantings....for shame..oh well...keep the faith 😇