Originally posted by jackstain
i have a questionnow, no doubting maul would lose easily, but ive seen in many threads the ol' "hes killed more people" defense.
i dont like it.
anakin certainly killed more people and is more powerful than obi wan....but somehow manages to find his way into the hot tub?
weird, right?
no! this defense blows. And Vader certainly killed a lot more than luke, and is more powerful....yet....loses. (his hand, the fight, and his dignity)
Maul killed more than obi-but lost(shakes fist)
more than likely yoda has killed more than sids(seeing as how yoda is older than dirt) and loses.
grievous has killed more than obi, most likely, and gets owned.
i think we get the point, hmm?
Killing people and killing Jedi is a completely different thing, and its not necessarily about killing more, its also about the great gain of experience by killing Jedi. When you fight a lot of them your used to fighting them, when you fight one for the first time for real its going to be harder.
A marine that has seen more combat then a rookie will beat the rookie when the two fight against each other. Not necessarily because he is stronger but because he has more experience and knows what to do.