Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
I think whatever victory you've gained is a hollow one, whirlysplat. I'm pretty sure most people just stopped reading at "Laws of Thermodynamics" and started again at Paola's post.
Iagree totally swanky, I'm just seeingnow how high I can get the post count on this thread 😄 Its "spamtastic"😄
Originally posted by whirlysplat
Sill no reply to my apology from CC and its been days😄 Now thats silly 😄
Whatever apology you have made, I accept. I don't post here every day.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
all laws are basically theories, nothing can actually be a true law in science.
Laws are the derivative of theorem proven to be constant. No theory that cannot be proven to be irrefutable can be a law.
The topic of this thread died long ago. Everyone knows who wins.
Yup me, but seriously I think for most of the thread we were at cross purposes anyway and to stubbourn to admit it. I said Laws coould be revised. A point you never really discussed and you said Laws were stronger than theories a point I never discussed. I said laws like the conservation of mass could be revised (Which they have been) and I said th a lot of modern laws are about to have to change for new science to work. E=MC2 theory which led to the A bomb is about to go and the knock on affect to the Laws it is based on may well require revision. So CC whilst I enjoyed our disscusion, I unfortunately was fishing with you and you took the bait, for that I am sorry
Originally posted by Cosmic Cube😄
Whatever apology you have made, I accept. I don't post here every day.Laws are the derivative of theorem proven to be constant. No theory that cannot be proven to be irrefutable can be a law.
The topic of this thread died long ago. Everyone knows who wins.